Archive for March, 2014

A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part Five

March 31, 2014

The following is the fifth in a series of polemical essays devoted to proving that “god given rights” are only rhetorical contrivances created by man, and are in reality nothing but lies. Judging from historical precedent, it is plainly evident that American citizens have no inalienable, god given rights at all and they never did. Further, the only rights people have ever had anywhere, at any time in history, are rights that they take by force, and maintain by employing further force when necessary.

In a departure from preceding essays, this particular installment will be written in a more traditional fashion, sans expletives. I recently received a missive on my public email address where the correspondent stated that what I was relating is, in his opinion, too important to lace with foul language, ribald remarks and racial epithets. Having considered the message over several days, I found that I agree with his observation.

Therefore, for the remainder of these polemics I shall refrain from using “colorful” language; exceptions being future essays or rants unrelated to the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. However, I will continue to refer to politicians and their police enforcers by employing somewhat “uncomplimentary” descriptions, as follows: aloof, elitist scoundrels, jackbooted thugs, amoral meretricians, badged privateers, soft palmed, mendacious gangsters, hypocrites, duly-sworn pirates, megalomaniacs, trigger-happy sadists, and so forth. In addition, earlier articles related to the Bill of Rights will be edited for “offensive” content, revised and presented separately on another blog, as an “updated, sanitized version” of the original essays. The original articles, as written, will be preserved here for reference and continuity.

Over the past four installments, the reader has learned via historical example that they do not have freedom of belief, speech or association; they do not have the right to keep and bear arms, nor do they have the right to prevent troops from being quartered in their homes, neither do they have the right to be secure in their homes, properties and papers. The reader has also learned that for most of the history of this nation, the Bill of Rights did not even apply to the States, and now only certain rights do apply to the States, in limited circumstances. Further, even when they do apply, cunning rhetorical machinations are employed by the State’s well-paid shysters to thwart the citizen/victim from exercising their “rights” in the pursuit of justice. In other words, if they want you, they will get you, in any way and every way they can, your “god given rights” notwithstanding.

Again, it is asserted that James Madison, author of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, was either a very naive, well intentioned, intelligent man, or a very shrewd, capable, intelligent man; that determination will be left for the reader to decide.

I now present the text of the Fifth Amendment for the reader, verbatim:


No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

On the surface, the above Amendment seems to be a cogent statement, though the text is a blatant example of a run-on sentence with too many semicolons. A caveat is very apparent as well, which will be elaborated on shortly. The text of the Fifth Amendment will now be dissected and analyzed for the reader. After presentation, each section will be refuted, using historical judicial precedent, and proven for the lies that they are. 

Beginning the analysis, the first two sections of the Fifth Amendment will be contrasted against each other: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,”.

The above statement seems quite reasonable, though when contrasted with the next section, “except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;” one can see how ridiculously easy it is to completely negate the first section by using the second section, by employing “interpretive” legerdemain, dependent on the given situation.

Focusing on the text of the second section, when contrasted against the first section, it all depends on whether one is a member of the “land or naval forces” (armed forces) or the “Militia” (state armed forces, like the present day National Guard), “when in actual service in time of War or public danger”. In such situations, the first section obviously does not apply at all, and is rendered meaningless, as in examples of “summary judgement”, via Military Law, which always applies to those individuals serving in the armed forces, even in times of peace. 

That noted, historical precedent also shows that it is simple to arbitrarily classify a civilian citizen as a “sympathizer”, an “armed combatant” or a “spy” in a “time of War” or “public danger”, and to summarily judge and sentence the civilian accused via military law. So much for civilian citizens having the right not to be “held to answer for a capital, or otherwise “infamous crime”, e.g., murder, rape, kidnapping, robbery, brigandage, pillaging, or plundering, as a “presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury” no longer applies in such situations; you can be held, summarily convicted, shot, and interred within minutes, all without the benefit of a “Grand Jury”.

Further, what exactly constitutes a “war”? An invasion? Armed insurrection? A foreign war on the other side of the planet? A riot? A street corner fistfight? What exactly constitutes “public danger”? An earthquake? A hurricane? A tornado?  A bonfire? A drunken party of noisy revelers on New Year’s Eve? It all depends on how those in authority arbitrarily define a given situation, and in such cases, the first section of the Fifth Amendment becomes even more worthless than the moldy parchment it was written on. Further, all of it goes out the window if “martial law” is declared, which authorities can and will resort to implementing if their agenda is even remotely threatened.

One would suppose if no wars are going on, or no public danger is evident, that the first section may in fact apply in some cases, provided that the Fifth Amendment is recognized by authorities as “incorporated” against the States and the Federal Government. History has shown that those in power are out to jealously protect and further their own interests, period. Conversely, they couldn’t care less about the interests of accused citizens, guilty or not; they have unlimited resources as well, and the overwhelming majority of citizens do not.

Moving on to the third section: nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;” On the surface, this statement seems to be ironclad – if the authorities were honest men and not the cunning, amoral rhetoricians of today. Employing historical precedent, the above statement can be easily demolished by using contemporary judicial edicts over the past two decades, for example, Alex Blueford of Arkansas, cited in a link below. Presented further down in the list of links is the case of Terry Lynn Nichols, of Oklahoma City bombing infamy; this man tried twice for “capital or otherwise other infamous crimes” by cunning prosecutors legally splitting hairs with regard to the plainly contrived concept of “separate sovereignties” regarding the United States Federal and State governments. Other notable cases proving the above section from the Fifth Amendment is a lie are members of various police forces having been tried by the Federal Government for the same offenses, albeit cunningly disguised as “civil rights violations”, e.g., BART policeman Johannes Mehserle, who killed Oscar Grant for no discernible reason, and the four murderous, NOLA jackbooted thugs of the Danziger Bridge debacle.

Immediately below are links to earlier articles I wrote and posted with regard to police brutality. They are provided for reference, with the titles sanitized in accordance with my pledge to not employ “offensive” language in this piece. Warning – the articles themselves are NOT sanitized:

BART policeman Johannes Mehserle kills Oscar Grant

NOPD policemen kill unarmed, innocent people on Danziger Bridge

Here are several links, proving the above highlighted statement in the preceding paragraph as a lie, the Double Jeopardy Wikipedia link is given for reference:,8599,2096915,00.html

The below links illustrate and explain contemporary legalistic legerdemain with regard to “Independent or Separate Sovereigns” and “Double Jeopardy”.

The fourth section will be noted next:  “nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” There are several examples of this statement being violated by both the State and Federal Governments, but opposers of such a stance will attempt to split hairs as well, stating that some examples are “civil” cases, e.g., the IRS, as such the above statement does not apply. In a sense they are correct – none of it truly applies at all, as the Fifth Amendment is nothing but contrived mendaciousness for credulous, easily duped ignoramuses anyway.

Here is an article which easily explains the utterly absurd SCOTUS decision in the case of Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S.Ct. 2250 (2010), regarding “self incrimination” presented above:

This article gives the background of the above fatuous SCOTUS decision in the case of Salinas v. Texas, 133 S.Ct. 2174 (2013), also regarding “self incrimination:

Evidence from historical precedent plainly proves that the Fifth Amendment means very little in reality, if anything at all. This is especially apparent when nine arrogant, soft-palmed, wealthy, elitist rhetoricians, shrouded in ridiculous robes, can simply bang a gavel and blithely state that you have no such right and that you never did. That, reader, is EXACTLY how it works; so much for your “inalienable, god given rights”; the concept is not only untenable, based on the above adjudicated cases, but utterly obtuse to anyone capable of critical thinking. 

Facts are facts – throughout history, the race of man gives man rights. Rights are not given by a god, nor are the rights that man gives man “inalienable”. Man can, and does, take them away, via legislation, judicial edict, or martial law – god, if such a creature exists, has nothing at all to do with it. At best, our rights are privileges at best, and during the past three decades, have been referred to by government shysters as “privileges”; simply watch old C-SPAN videos for verification.

Here are selected articles regarding your risible Fifth Amendment “right” against self incrimination, as applied to the IRS:

In addition, the very act of being legally required to file tax returns with the legally sanctioned protection racket known as the IRS is forcing one to give testimony against oneself, which is a violation of the Fifth Amendment – but I suppose that’s another story. You are legally required to PAY THEM from the fruits of YOUR LABORS, receiving NOTHING in return, or “something bad” will happen to you, like fines and PRISON. Al Capone couldn’t have figured out a better racket. The aloof, condescending, elitist criminals running the United States don’t care about you at all – they are out to bilk, enslave and control you, so they can maintain their power over you.

The fifth section is simply ludicrous: “nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”. Tell that meaningless sophistry to the police, who mow innocent people down everyday, from every walk of life, killing them on the street, in vehicles, and even in their own homes.

Links to classic cases illustrating the above section as nothing but a lie are easily available, and have been referred to in my earlier essays as well:

Yes, I shall beat these thoroughly dead horses until they disarticulate from the relentless assault – considering that so many of the supposed “rights” of the above victims were deliberately ignored by the megalomanical tyrants and their jackbooted enforcers running this moribund nation.

Here’s a few more, both cases have been referred to in earlier polemical essays:

I wager it is safe to say the above individuals were deprived of life, liberty and property, without due process of law. There are HUNDREDS of other victims of the sadistic, badged pirates called police, slaughtering innocent citizens in the “name of the law”:

Yeah, I know – the police make “mistakes” – and then they LIE about their actions, and often get away with it. Further, their victims are DEAD, and there is no recovering from that.

The sixth section is now presented: nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” 

The authorities have gotten around this section using a ridiculously easy method: “Civil Forfeiture”. You see, “civil” cases are not covered by the Fifth Amendment. All the soft palmed scoundrels have to do is to have their enforcers, badged, jackbooted, duly sworn pirates, declare you a “drug dealer”, or a child molester, or perhaps a terrorist, without ANY EVIDENCE, and then they can “legally” steal your money, seize your bank accounts, take your house and car, and leave you utterly DESTITUTE, without “compensation” for your losses.

Here are links to several cases, proving that the United States Federal and State governments, using their enforcers, the police, can steal any of your property, for no legitimate reason at all, and there is nothing that you can do about it at all.

Here is a convenient link to the “rules” that our elected gangsters and their enforcers use to legally steal your property:

Even the mendacious, verminous, megalomanical jackanapes in the White House has gotten into the act of legalized thievery, with an Executive Order plainly stating that HE and his minions can steal YOUR PROPERTY, and any other property that he can lay his scurvy paws on, in the name of baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet.

Aside from easily proving the last section of the Fifth Amendment as the lie that it is, there is also a not-so-hidden reason for the explosion of asset forfeitures within the United States – the Federal Government and the States are virtually bankrupt, with the elected criminals now resorting to STEALING from their own citizens to fund their agenda of POWER for themselves and CONTROL over the people as serfs in a fiefdom. Eventually, the entire corrupt system, rotten from top to bottom, will collapse, igniting a vicious insurrection that will destroy whatever is left of the United States, in a blood-drenched revolt that will make the French and Bolshevik Revolutions look like amateurish skirmishes. Those who have nothing left to lose have everything to win, and it will take only a small part of the populace to achieve that aim.

Coming to the end of this polemical essay, after dissection, analysis, and refutation of each section by employing citations contradicting accepted beliefs, I submit that the entire text of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is a tissue of mendacity, or quite plainly, a LIE. I have employed documents from the United States government to prove this – having used their own words AGAINST THEM.

Some may not like what I have written, but I don’t care about that; I never have and I never will. I invite any reader, from accredited Constitutional Scholar, to jingoistic cretin, to refute what I contend, using the same method of historical precedent, citation of adjudicated cases, and explanation of cited cases, to prove me wrong.

Stay tuned for the next installment, when I destroy the Sixth Amendment, and prove it for the lie that it is.




A Tale Told by an IDIOT, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying NOTHING

March 23, 2014

I told the fool who insisted upon contacting me that I would post his or her inane remarks for all to see, verbatim, and I am fulfilling that promise. Fool is definitely the proper word to describe my feckless adversary, considering the repetitive, obtuse qualities of his or her remarks.

I shall intersperse deep analysis and associated commentary between each remark.

I considered such a post years ago when a fainthearted Muslim sandnigger fucked with me, but the faggot disappeared, so I didn’t bother with it.

This time – I AM BOTHERING; I delight in making examples of idiots, and my friend Anonymous, who is too cowardly to reveal his or her name, is the epitome of an idiot.

Dialogue follows, with the Anonymous posters remarks highlighted:

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:06
I guess it depends on whose constitution you’re talking about. / I find some to be a little more worthwhile.

Even at this point I find it impossible to believe that an individual would be so stupid to post meaningless drivel such as the above. I sincerely doubt that the poster has ever read much of anything, let alone a Constitution.

Conway 20 March, 2014 20:22
Well, I think it should be quite clear that I have been writing about the Constitution of the United States of America. I have perused other constitutions as well, and none I have read so far addresses personal liberty and freedom from governmental interference as well as Madison’s Constitution does.

Too bad that it is only sophistry, words on a page, and not enforced as it was originally intended. I submit that the same goes for any other constitution, as man is the measure of all things, and is, unfortunately, prone to hypocrisy. The arrogant, elitist criminals running the United States today are absolute proof of that.

Here, I was attempting to be polite, thinking that possibly the individual was a foreigner, and clearly pointed out that I was writing about the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:38
Do you not think actual enforcement of said constitution would lead to a number of someones getting hurt, and does that not concern you in the least.

This remark is either stupid, contrived, or the individual does not understand the meaning of the word “enforcement” with regard to the Bill of Rights. Then again, perhaps he or she was serious, thinking that enforcement of the Bill of Rights would “hurt” the elitists and their jackbooted pigs, duly charged with keeping the rest of us in line.

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:49
You don’t think it’s been enforced? How much more enforcing needs to take place? How many years, how many tears? Curious.

This remark seems to prove that the individual is a cretin, considering that “enforcing” the Bill of Rights would lead to less “tears”, considering that the people’s rights would be respected by the authorities.

Conway 20 March, 2014 23:27
Apparently, you do not understand what I have written.

The Constitution of the United States of America is not being enforced, and people are suffering because of that. 

Liberty, freedom and the full exercise of individual rights are the objective of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The elitists running this nation do not want that, and never did.

This needs no further explanation.

Conway 20 March, 2014 23:32
It’s definite – you do not understand what I have written at all, your reading comprehension skills are lacking. 

That, or you are deliberately trying to waste my time by posting a nonsensical argument. 

Have a good evening.

Strangely, I missed his second reply until a little later, and his/her latter remark convinced me that the individual was incapable of understanding the essay.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 04:59
No, Im the only one on here attempting to make sense of what the fick you’re saying. And talk to you. Again, it seems, the only one to do so.

It is obvious that the individual cannot make sense of what I was saying due to either not reading it, or not possessing the intellect to understand what I was relating. That, or he/she was simply fucking with me, which, after reflection, is probably the case. Notice the missing punctuation in the contraction; and the misspelled “fuck”. Then, the individual wrongfully assumed that I was interested in conversation with them, when the only thing I was and am interested in is having someone challenge or refute my position in the essay.

Conway 21 March, 2014 13:27
My dear Anonymous,

Okay, you asked for it.

Your poorly composed responses to my current polemical essay are little more than meaningless, incoherent drivel. Apparently you have not even read it, judging from your obtuse remarks. Further, I sincerely doubt that you could understand the article even if you did read it; I suspect that you do not have the intellectual capacity for such a task.

I candidly wager that you are some bizarre type of troll or perhaps a lower level NSA employee, too inept to even create a profile for reference, making a pathetic attempt to get a rise out of me for whatever reason. You are wasting your time, others have tried, and you have missed the mark by miles. 

Moving on, judging from your writing “style”, which I believe to be contrived, you are probably the same individual who showed up a few years back on the Wagist site and followed me here. If that is so, I suggest you find someone else to play with; so far I find you ignorant and quite unchallenging.

That said, I write for catharsis, not popularity; you are judging others by your own criteria, and have made an inaccurate value judgment with regard to my intention. Try the Hegelian Dialectic next time; I have instructed the reader how to employ that aspect of critical thinking in past essays.

My challenge to you and any other reader is to prove my assertions in the above and other essays as inaccurate, or “wrong”, and to prove such charges by using cited facts, historical precedent, and case law. If you can accomplish that – I wish you luck in doing so.

That is all I am after, period – nothing else matters here. 

If you cannot refute my position, simply say so, and move onto something else.



This needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:41
You are the most unpleasant human being I’ve ever come across, and I truly regret ever given time amd money to you. The waste of a life was spent trying to give anything of value to you. Don’t contact me again. and go fucking die, you walking abortion.

Notice the extreme anger at my reply, which was not complimentary, yes, but my response was civil, for the most part. 

Then, as if I should care, the individual informed me that I was “the most unpleasant human being they had ever come across”. I wager he/she doesn’t get out very much, or lives in an asylum of sorts or perhaps a monastery. Then the poster goes on to write “I truly regret ever given time amd (sic) money to you”. Note the grammatical mistake as well; I suspect anger is ruling his or her thoughts, or perhaps the poster is simply uneducated. The time and money remark I find enigmatic, considering that the time involved in interacting with me was minuscule, and no exchange of specie was involved. Then, in a ridiculous attempt to manipulate the conversation, the poster wrote further incoherent drivel, telling me not to “contact them again”, which I never have, and ended their rant with sophomoric expletives.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:43
The waste of time comes from thinking that you actually had something of importance to say, and trying to make sense of it. I don’t plan on doing that again.

Whether my words are important remains to seen; notice the poor word usage in the beginning of the the poster’s sentence. It is fortunate that he/she didn’t plan on trying to make sense of the essay, as he or she is evidently incapable of making sense of much of anything, including having the ability to pour piss out of a boot, with the directions written on the heel.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:50
That means stay away from my friends and family too, creepy pathetic stalking freak.

This remark is thoroughly puerile. Apparently, it was meant to put me on the defensive; it actually made me laugh.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:04
Please, go see a psychiatrist before you harm yourself, or others.

I actually meant that, the individual is obviously disturbed, judging from the “goofy” remarks so far. The disjointed, repetitive replies show that the poster has obsessive tendencies, and does not like being dismissed as irrelevant by anyone, even by an old fart like me who writes vitriolic polemical essays on an unknown blog for the sheer hell of it.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:00
My dear Anonymous,

I never have contacted you – you contacted me. You could have avoided that by not bothering, but you insisted. Ergo, it is your fault that you are pissed off, and that I am laughing at you.

You have effortlessly proven my point before the entire world; you are an ignorant individual who doesn’t even recall the idiotic drivel that you have composed. With each post you make you bury yourself further; good riddance to bad rubbish, I say.

I also notice that you cannot refute one thing that I wrote in the essay – I win the argument by default, and you are defeated.

Further, you have never given time or money to me, you don’t know who I am and you never will, and as far as I am concerned, you can go fuck yourself, cretin.

Angry much?



My reply needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:04
You got that right. I don’t . Don’t plan on spending anymore time and money to figure it out either. You forgot the stay the fuck away from me and my family, however, you creepy walking aberration. .

This individual, the subject, is a very young, lonely person, 18 to 25, tops; I seriously doubt that they have a family, unless it is “Mother and Dad”, in that order. 

If the poster is male – a classic, infantile deviate, Freudian Oedipus Complex is indicated, with probable sexual inexperience, other than occasional masturbation with dominatrix overtones and guilt feelings afterward; possible homosexual tendencies as well, subject’s attraction to men is subconscious, but evident, based on obsessive interaction and gravitation toward male or masculine figures.

If female, the subject is an overweight, rejected, easily orgasmic virgin, addicted to clitoral masturbation without penetration, due to guilt feelings; headed for spinsterhood due to unrealistic standards. Often sits quietly, unobserved, with the heel of her foot in her crotch, preferring one over the other dependent on dexterity for masturbation purposes, young male celebrities the object of her fantasies. 

Please note the clumsy, second attempt to put me on the defensive, with the childish ending of the reply.

My evaluation of the gender of subject: 93% chance that the poster is male, or perhaps an extremely masculine lesbian; intersex hermaphrodite possibility as well; XXY or XYY karyotype possible. Further remarks on the subject will refer to he/she exclusively as “he, his or him”.

Ethnicity undefinable at this time, suspected Caucasoid of southern European extraction.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:09
You are the obtuse cretin who keeps making a fool of yourself – I’m actually enjoying this.

I’m laughing at you too – mentally ill individuals usually provoke laughter.

Incidentally – if you “know” me personally – what is my REAL NAME?



Yes, I was abusive toward the subject, as he was intent upon the delusional idea that he knew me personally, so the subject was challenged on that premise. Subject then became ambiguous, and then attempted to assign “supernatural” qualities to the object of his adversary. Paranoid delusion is evident. (See below, i.e. “Legion”)

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:13
Incidentally – I think I’ll do an article on YOU and your stupid remarks, posted en toto, with my responses, so the entire goddamned planet can see you for the absolute fucking idiot that you are.

Enjoy burying yourself further.

Have a nice day.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:19
Legion is your real name you fork toungued pig. Is this your newest incarnation? Wow this newest facet I doubt is going to make you the money your other fake fraudulent personas did.

Supernatural fantasies, based on Judeo-Christian and Muslim dogmas, 78% chance that subject is fundamentalist Christian, e.g., primitive Baptist, Pentecostal, or Seventh Day Adventist. 15% chance that subject is Muslim, possibly of Druze or Sufi sect; 5% chance that subject is of Jewish faith, i.e., orthodox Kabbalist. Sanity of subject now in question. Overall percentage estimate of fanatical religious belief: 98%. Spelling mistake noted, perhaps due to stupidity.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:22
Why not. You’ve al
Ready written about me, my family, my friends, not to mention how many other people you’ve stalked over the years. Go for it.

Subject now displays primitive fear/threat reaction, easily predictable, with regard to family, friends, et cetera; fabricated “threat” to dear ones noted and cataloged accordingly as a defensive posture. Subject continues to imply that I am a supernatural being from mythical place called hell, a creature named “Legion”, taken from New Testament Bible, likely KJV or Douai translation, subject’s reasoning based on archaic superstition. Please note the odd mistake in spelling  – “alReady”.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 15:30
Put the other comments pig. I own your sorry evil ass and you know it.

Subject seems to think that old fart Conway is entirely devoted to him, and that my existence is dependent on his every word. Note the “pig” reference, either taken from my polemics, or perhaps employed from his personal, superstitious worldview. Percentiles have changed, if subject is fundamentalist Christian, a Seventh Day Adventist tops the probability, with Muslim Sufi coming second, and Jewish Orthodox third. Probability of subject being an atheist: less than one percent.

Conway 21 March, 2014 20:30
If you are indeed serious, and are not just mentally masturbating for some kind of puerile lark, you seem to delight in burying yourself. Alright; I’ll play your little game, though I do realize that you have a very limited capacity for debate, if one can call this unproductive series of ludicrous exchanges a debate.

For example, you have absolutely no idea as to who I am, and your ridiculous, inane replies reflect that fact. That noted – kindly tell me what my given name is, here, and in what State of the Union that I reside in, that is, if you “know” me so well, which you do not, and never will. You are being mendacious, in other words a liar, for someone of your limited intellect, and if you actually do believe that you know me, you are in fact delusional. Considering your words; I suggest a visit to a psychiatrist, coupled with appropriate doses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. Such compounds may prove effective for assisting you in dealing with your delusions – do you hallucinate as well?

Try lithium.

Further, your spelling is absolutely atrocious, and your grammar leaves a lot to be desired. You can barely compose a coherent sentence, and your obvious anger at my blithe dismissal of your ill-thought replies only makes the situation worse – for you. Incidentally, if you had even half a brain, you could easily find my given name and where I reside from various posts I have made over the Internet – I’ll give you a clue – the initials of my first and last name fall between the letters of “F” and “N” in the English alphabet.

Oh well, this may help increase your ire – I don’t care in the least of what you may think of me, and I dare you to make even one attempt to refute anything that I alleged in the article, which you cannot, due to not even understanding anything I have written. I actually find you entertaining, to a degree, and your remarks have made me laugh out loud. For that, I thank you.

Referring to your pathetic attempt at assigning personal nomenclature to an individual you will never meet – your laughable Biblical references from the Gospels of the New Testament only reveal you to be some variety of idiotic, dogmatic religious fanatic, who believes in silly, non-existent creatures like demons, angels, and gods. That is your problem, all the belief in the universe will not bring such entities into existence. Further, your foul mouth and ad hominem remarks make you a hypocrite, which is very typical of the “Christians” I have met, along with other mentally disturbed fanatics like Muslims.

Look for my article on you, exemplifying you and your words before the entire world as a drooling cretin.

Keep replying, you are only pouring gasoline on a fire. Warning: If your replies are not sufficiently obtuse, and entertaining, I will simply delete them and be done with you.

Have a good evening,


This post needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 22 March, 2014 05:00
You’re hardly one to prostelyze about hypocrisy, fraud. How did you make your money? Not by acting like the pig you portraying at the moment.

This post is probing, the subject is attempting to make me justify my position, without any compelling reason, ergo, observer ignored it. He cunningly asks about my livelihood; I have repeatedly stated that I built my position by servicing electronics in the past, along with trading equities in hard commodities. Then he compares me to a porcine creature, without having any effect, as I could not care less about his view of me. Refer to above analysis regarding the superstitious, with regard to pigs.

Conway 22 March, 2014 05:26
Ah yes, you are here – I am very glad of that, and I thank you very much for your response. You made me mentally cum with your latest inane reply; I am quite satisfied; I relish in your gross stupidity. Keep feeding me, you fucking idiot.

Your latest fecklessness easily passed my litmus test for both obtusity and entertainment; therefore I approved it. Fuck up and I will delete further replies and silence you at my leisure – you must pass my tests from now on.

As a public service, I will inform you when I decide to silence your squawkings, should you fail to be entertaining.

I have proven you for the utter superstitious fool that you are. I will even tell you the title of my post devoted to YOU: ” A Tale Told by an Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing”.

You definitely signify nothing.

I have already written the outline, I’m simply waiting for you to post more entertainment; I’ve even posted another essay in the meantime, devoted to your moronic, inept, megalomanical nigger jackanapes.

Please, I appeal to you, keep burying yourself, I’m loving it.

Kind Regards,


Anonymous 22 March, 2014 06:21
I know the name you’ve decided to adopt, after challenging me to read your lanced, puss filled posts. It is however, not the name I originally associate with you, is it.

The adjectival definition of the the word “asshole” defines the subject’s idiotic post, with allusions to “Legion” again; note how the subject uses a repeated “s” in his clumsy attempt to spell “pus”, a purulent exudation of dead bacteria and white blood cells from a common abscess.

Conway 22 March, 2014 14:16

I’m sorry, but your latest post, which I published for you, was completely obtuse, though not sufficiently entertaining. Therefore, I am forced to do something that I have never done before on this blog – I shall no longer approve further comments from you.

You have written enough to enable me to easily identify your peculiar prose, and even if you attempt to alter it, I will still be able to recognize, and delete it. Let’s just say that I have a patented “moron detector”, and leave it at that.



With great regret, I had to do this – I enjoy sparring with people, but even I have to draw a line somewhere – the poster is a delusional religious fanatic, probably an insane, fucking idiot, not worth my time.

Predictably, the attracted, obsessed, latent homosexual dummy had to post yet another inane rant – which I refused to approve; my stipulations binding on me as well, but I shall post them here for continuity, to show him for the fool that he is:

How apt. Free speech further limited by you, While you prattle away at the rights this country no longer affords people. And angry that once upon a time you felt That i limited free speech. All while having a fit that I dared try talking to you. Typical. Don’t worry, you too have a pattern that seems to be your m.o. 

Conway’s take: Sour grapes from Aesop’s Fables. Notice the ridiculous capitalization errors. The subject in question, a feckless idiot, doesn’t even understand the concept of “free speech” as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America. Free Speech applies to GOVERNMENTS, not individual people, or businesses. I reserve the right to refuse to publish the inane replies of morons, using my patented “moron detector”, and our friend anonymous is the absolute epitome of a fucking moron with the collective intellect of a ten pound bag of russet potatoes.

In fairness, I will give the deviant subject, an obviously obsessed, insane individual, a chance to reply, but only on this post – any remarks on earlier or forthcoming essays will be summarily deleted.

Go ahead, subject, I guarantee that you will have free reign here, to refute my analysis of YOU – I give you my word as a man that I will publish whatever you have to say, at MY LEISURE, but only on this particular post. Beware that I will slap you down accordingly with each post that you make. Take my bait, you goddamned fool – come on, you cowardly pussy, I DARE YOU to fuck with me – I will DESTROY YOU, with no holds barred. When you do not respond, as I flawlessly predict, I will repeatedly make note of that too in later essays.

Analysis and prognosis: Subject Anonymous is a goddamned deranged, delusional fruitcake and a dangerous, superstitious freak, who should be confined indefinitely in an institution, to ensure the safety of others.

ADDENDUM: The lunatic took my bait, and posted further absurdities, as follows:

Get it through your fucking head, you evil fucking stalking pig. I’m not your fucking dog, go fuckiñg die, diseased piece of shit. Stay gone from me and my family. 

You ARE my dog, motherfucker – bark for me, then heel. If I decide to become charitable, I’ll order you to fetch a dried up turd on my back lawn shat from the ass of my trained ocelot. Be nice, or I’ll order you to fetch fresh turds shat from the asses of my Boudreaux bulldogs.

The subject is indeed dangerous – he is delusional, and should be forcibly confined before he hurts himself or others.

Kind Regards,


More Incompetence from the Arrogant, Inept, Idiotic Jackanapes

March 22, 2014

Between trading stocks, sparring with imbeciles and creating vicious polemics ripping apart the Bill of Rights, proving them for the absolute lies that they are, I have gleefully watched the obtuse, narcissistic eight-ball, Barack “jackanapes” Obama, make a complete fool of himself across the entire goddamned planet. His feckless sidekicks, Dolt Biden and Frankenstein Kerry, have only added to the hilarity, completely powerless to do anything about their new Lex Luthor – Vladimir Putin, who marched the Russian Army unopposed onto the Crimean peninsula, an area important to Russian interests, and none of the business of the meddling United States.

Outclassed in every maneuver, Jackanapes Obama, an oafish dilettante so far out of his league that he might as well be governing from Pluto, has been definitively shown for the two-faced hypocrite that he is by Putin and company. The moolie, continuing the idiotic actions of dunderhead George W. Bush, has armies still sitting in Afghanistan, with lesser forces parked in Iraq; we bombed Libya in 2011, and still have armed forces in South Korea, Germany and Japan, among other places. Frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog, warlord Obama even wanted to bomb Syria, assisting our “enemies” in Al-Qaeda to overthrow Bashir al-Assad, for whatever INSANE reason. In a clear example of “do as I say and not as I do”, the hypocritical jackanapes started mouthing off about how “wrong” Putin and his cohorts are, apparently due to the US wearing “white hats”, while the Russians sport black astrakhans. Double standards nauseate me, but when considering the dismal ethical record of US politicians, especially over the past century, I am not surprised in the least at their hypocritical actions.

After Mr. Putin annexed Crimea, with the population overwhelmingly approving, exercising their right of SELF-DETERMINATION, the inept jackanapes decided to impose meaningless “personal sanctions”, whatever they are or may be, on select members of Putin’s cabinet, together with other cronies, in a dubious attempt to “punish” them for not kowtowing to his shrill demands. So, what does any of that mean – that Putin can’t use Netflix or his American Express card? Further, exactly what items does the United States produce that Russia or any of its citizens would need, or even want?

The answer is – NOTHING. Russia doesn’t need the United States for anything; neither does China, for that matter. With the United States becoming increasingly irrelevant in world affairs, US politicians must employ every conceivable tactic to ensure their continued hegemony upon the rest of the world – even in affairs that are absolutely NONE of our fucking business. Now the jackanapes’ rhetoric is becoming even more ridiculous, making idle threats with regard to “economic sanctions”.

EARTH TO JACKANAPES OBAMA: Russia does not need us, and just because we don’t buy their borscht doesn’t mean that their market will dry up – there are plenty of other buyers, and your silly economic sanctions will accomplish NOTHING AT ALL. Perhaps that will be the crowning achievement of an Administration that has accomplished NOTHING of value since entering office, other than wasting trillions of dollars, and eroding the rights of the American people – just wait until Russia decides to dump our worthless T-Bills – gold, silver and oil will go to the MOON.

The Russians countered in a cynical tit-for-tat, barring nine soft-palmed, elitist gangsters from entering Russia – elected criminals like senile John McCain, crooked Harry Reid, drunk John Boehner, Robert Menendez, Mary Landrieu, and Daniel Coates, along with three of Obama’s closest, brown-nosed sycophants. I wouldn’t want pieces of shit like that in my nation either, unfortunately we are stuck with those amoral, self-serving bastards – I say bravo to the Russians.

Here’s the list of banned criminals:

All that noted, Jackanapes Obama’s impotent attempt at intimidation has only elicited LAUGHTER from his Russian adversaries, and the Russians know that America has no stomach for starting World War Three over something as trivial as the Crimean peninsula.

I’m laughing too – like a jackal.



A Nation, Founded on LIES – Part Three UPDATE

March 20, 2014

It was my intent to post this as an addendum to the original post, but those few who may have already read it are unlikely to re-read it, and the following incident is very important with regard to my contention, and proven factual assertion – that the Third Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America is a goddamned, motherfucking lie. Therefore, I will post this information separately; I was made aware of the following disgusting event via an email sent to me by a supporter over my private address. I must confess that I was remiss in my research, not having noticed that a contemporaneous example of my contention was available to display for my readers. Oh well, I’m an old bastard; meaner than a goddamn rattler and twice as deadly, but I am fallible too – perhaps I’m growing senile.

That brings us to a current example of Third Amendment violations by the powers that be, courtesy of my supporter, not that it really means anything, considering that the Third Amendment has not been “incorporated” against the States: The case of Mr. Anthony Mitchell, et al, of 367 Eveningside Avenue, Henderson Nevada 89012. I woefully submit that this case will go nowhere, due to the cunning machinations of shysters and historical precedent, just like when I was dubbed a “drug dealer” – for simply carrying MY MONEY on MY PERSON. Yes, I will NEVER forget that, for as long as I live – ALL cops are PIGS, and I laugh like a goddamned jackal whenever any of them are killed, for whatever reason.

On 10 July 2011, at 10:45 AM, porcine swine called Anthony Mitchell and stated they needed to commandeer his domicile to facilitate the arrest of a “domestic violence” suspect at an unspecified domicile adjacent to his domicile. Mitchell refused, as was his right, and hung up the phone, confident that his home was his castle, and inviolable by by the authorities.

He was WRONG.

Suck on these links – go ahead, tell me I’m a fucking liar, I have yet to get even ONE missive refuting my assertions that our “rights” are LIES:

I did not write the above articles – oh well, either everyone is a coward, or no one can refute my assertions that the entire Bill of Rights is a goddamned, motherfucking LIE, not worth the parchment it was written on.

Returning to the case:

Shortly thereafter, near noon, five jackbooted SWAT thugs showed up at Mr. Anthony Mitchell’s house, and beat on his door in the name of the law, demanding that he “open up” for the duly sworn, armed gangsters. Undaunted by the lack of a response, as Mr. Mitchell was on the phone, conversing with his parents, they broke his door down with a battering ram in the name of baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie. Entering his home after the door was smashed down, the armed invaders drew guns on him and ordered him to the floor of his home, while calling him a rube, motherfucker, or cocksucker, or whatever pigs currently use to intimidate their victims – all in the name of freedom, of course. Rubbing it in, the arrogant, victorious gestapo freebooters pepper sprayed him, while he was helpless and prone on the floor, in the name of Chevrolet. Then they did the same fucking thing to his hapless dog, perhaps in the name of Mack Trucks, you know – the “bulldog” ornament sitting on the hoods of highway tractors of that American brand name.

Drunk on their power, the duly sworn, badged pirates then “arrested” Mr. Mitchell, for “obstructing an officer” and dragged him from his home to their pigsty, in the name of Betsy Ross, George Washington, and Chairman Mao. Strike the Ross and Washington invocations, as fucking Chairman Mao only apples in this case. Then they fucked up his furniture, and set up their “command post”, so they could conduct “surveillance” on the nearby domicile of the “domestic violator”.

Meanwhile, pigs also invaded the backyard of 362 Eveningside Avenue, Henderson, Nevada, 89012, home of Mr. Michael Mitchell, and his wife Linda, parents of Mr Anthony Mitchell. Mrs. Mitchell answered, and the duly sworn pirates demanded entry. Mrs Mitchell refused, and the pigs shoved her aside and entered her domicile in the name of freedom. Dragging her from her home, one pig began “searching” though her purse for “evidence”, without a warrant, as is specified by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, which is a “right” incorporated against the States by the Warren Supreme Court, in the case Mapp vs. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).

Then the pigs wandered about the latter Mitchell’s “compound”, searching for whatever, consumed potables within, dumped contents from their refrigerator to the floor of their kitchen, and QUARTERED theirselves within the domicile.

Mr. Michael Mitchell, father of Anthony Mitchell, was “arrested” as well, and ferried to the pigsty in an oink-mobile. Both were “booked” for “obstructing an officer”. Father Michael Mitchell and and son Anthony were held for nine hours of their mortal fucking lives for no legitimate goddamned reason at all, by jackbooted PIRATES, who think it is their RIGHT to be obnoxious, bullying assholes, and who think they have the RIGHT to threaten anyone who gets in their way – with abuse, arrest, or even death.

Curiously enough, all charges against the Mitchells were dropped, as anyone with half a fucking brain knows they would have been acquitted anyway by a voir dired jury of their peers. The pigs tried to offer that in exchange for not being sued, as when I beat the “drug dealer” charges leveled against me – a judge actually telling a vociferous pig to shut up after he had adjudicated the case. Then the all-powerful State told me that unless I signed a form absolving them of all wrongdoing, they would simply STEAL my money that they took from me and I would have no recourse. It was a considerable sum in those days and I needed it for operating capital at my business. I could have sued but it would have taken years, and I would have received essentially the same amount after legal fees. One bird in hand is worth two in the bush, so I signed and reclaimed my hard-earned bucks from those fucking pirates. They still got away with stealing the tools out of my beat-up old rusty junker, toolbox and all. Yes, I have always driven used pieces of shit, new vehicles are not worth the capital invested; it is more prudent to invest surplus cash in equities.

I vividly recall the cloudy day when my funds were returned, they had offered a check earlier – I DEMANDED my CASH. My mouthpiece, a hook-nosed kike, told me that “a state check is the same as cash”. I said no, and that I wanted my money that they had taken from me. The next day, my funds were returned, in cash, sans a silver certificate which had been given to me decades earlier by my grandfather.

The Assistant State’s Attorney was there; he looked like the veritable personification of a limp-wristed, cocksucking fairy. As he handed me my funds, he said, “I’m sure you got this money by illegal means.” 

I frowned and replied, “Fuck you, douchebag.” 

My kike mouthpiece said, “You can’t talk to him that way – he’s the Assistant States Attorney!”

I looked at my lawyer, who had already been paid, and replied, “The fact that I just did proves that I can.” I then got up and left, and never spoke to that fawning, kike bastard again.

I’ll tell you one thing, reader – if I EVER get my revenge on them, it won’t be pretty. Like Roman Emperor Carinus, I would hunt those bastards down and then coldly crucify those nazi pigs, and laugh beneath their blood-soaked crosses as they died in exquisite agony, like a latter day Vlad the Impaler. I don’t forget, and I never forgive. I am not a Christian, and I am the one who will “take vengeance upon mine enemies”, given the chance. Incidentally, I have NO criminal record, unless you want to count a few “traffic tickets”, for having the unmitigated audacity to drive around in an ancient, rusted out, oil belching refugee from a goddamned car crusher.

Returning to the Mitchell case – does any of the above matter? No, the pigs didn’t fucking care, just like with my case of decades ago, and neither does our corrupt government that facilitates them. All they are interested in is POWER, and CONTROL over the PEOPLE. They don’t care whose “rights” are violated, as the Constitution is only sophistry; words on a page, written by man, and thus cannot enforce itself. The cunning monsters running this bankrupt joint know this, and so do I – toilet paper has more value; at least it is good for wiping shit from asses of either sex or clinging drops of piss from dripping cunts, whereas the Constitution is perhaps useful for lining birdcage floors, and little else.

My prognostication on the above case:

It will be quickly decided in the favor of the plaintiffs first; then appealed by the defendants and reversed by an appellate court in favor of the defendants, then it will be appealed to SCOTUS by the plaintiffs. SCOTUS will either refuse to hear the case, which is my wager, or will decide in the favor of the defendants, to maintain the status quo.

I would bet all that I own, to ANY gamester, double or nothing, that the Mitchells will LOSE their case in the end.

That’s “justice” for you, drone – get used to it, and kneel to your esteemed betters like the common serf that you are.

The elitists relishing in their Pyrrhic victory, soon after that, the United States of America will be wracked by insurrection, civil war, and revolution – a literal BLOODBATH – who the fuck knows how it will turn out, and who really cares? I don’t; I submit that anything, anarchy, libertarianism, communism, national socialism, or actually IMPLEMENTING the original CONSTITUTION of the United States of America, as INTENDED, is better than a laughable, fraudulent nation based on LIES, and run by CRIMINALS.

Then again, during the “dark time” the United States could be invaded and destroyed by outside influences; that’s what you get for ARROGANCE and DECADENCE. In that case, America will get what it DESERVES.

If the former scenario prevails, I truly hope that I live to see it, along with the attendant show trials of those defeated – and it won’t be those who started the insurrection, I assure you. Those with nothing to lose have everything to gain, history has proven that repeatedly. Three percent of the populace can topple this illegitimate regime, and send it to the flaming hell where it belongs. Sheer force of will shall triumph in the coming reckoning, and blood will run in the streets.

I plan to laugh manically at our “betters”, to their goddamned faces if I can, before they receive the vicious justice they deserve.



A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part Two

March 11, 2014

Well, I wager my preceding post woke someone up – hits went up like a bat out of hell, courtesy of my good friends at the NSA or the CIA, or maybe even the FBI. I wager someone, somewhere, doesn’t like what I have to say at all, even though there isn’t one thing they can do about it, legallySearching for anything that could be construed as a threat to anyone, they finally closed the page in bitter disappointment, angrily conceding that your friend Conway, whose true identity they already know, chooses his words very, very carefully. 
That aside, speculating further, perhaps they’ll send the IRS after me for daring to tell the truth about this cadaverous farce of a nation, or maybe they’ll elect to use the Secret Service, in a pathetic attempt at intimidation, sternly accusing me of “disrespecting” that disgusting, inept, narcissistic nigger jackanapes Obama, sitting on his goddamned brain in the White House.


Are you fucking kidding me – respect is EARNED, and Obama has not earned mine. Hell, I’d call that banana-lipped mulatto jungle bunny to his goddamned face if I ever encountered him, on national television, mind you. I have more respect for blood-bloated bedbugs than I ever could for a clown like Barack Obama – or his retarded predecessor, empty-eyed honky George W. Bush. Both are excrement under my feet, unworthy of respect or acknowledgement given to mangy felines. 

H. L. Mencken said it best: “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” 

Empty-eyes and the jackanapes are absolute PROOF of that assertion.

Further, according to the First Amendment, whether it is a lie or not, I am allowed to disrespect anyone that I want to, but that’s another story. Refer to the preceding post for verification of that assertion. 

Exploring another scenario, our esteemed betters may even employ a jackbooted gestapo pig to simply pull me over in the name of the law on a dark country road while driving my old, rusty junker home from the local convenience store – for the felonious crime of a bad tag light, and then dutifully blow my brains out all over the well-worn and split Naugahyde front bench seat. Afterward, the duly sworn servant of the people will plant an old, rusty rim-fire .32 on my cooling cadaver, in the name of freedom, god, George Washington, and Civil Rights. The following morning, Goebbelsian headlines will shrilly state that I was a terrorist, or a drug dealer, or a child molester, or that I didn’t love Jesus, or whatever it will take to paint kindly old Conway as as the most despicable fucking creature to have ever lived since Gaius Caligula, Emperor of the Romans. I won’t give a shit what they will say, as I’ll no longer exist, except as a rotting carcass of deanimated meat sitting in a local morgue.
I have yet to see one comment refuting my position that the First Amendment is a lie, though an anonymous commenter stated that they envied my vocabulary, and that Zip Code 12345 was based in Schenectady, New York at the General Electric home office. GE is a company founded by Thomas Edison, another atheist who invented a whole shitload of devices, like light bulbs, DC power distribution, phonographs, and the Kinetograph, an early motion picture camera. I found the Zip Code information to be an interesting piece of trivia, and thanked him or her for their input. The picture at the top of this essay is a nod to the anonymous poster.
That said, this vicious polemical essay will be devoted to exposing the Second Amendment for the LIE that it is, using American history and current events to SHOW the reader that it as nothing but mendacious sophistry used to dupe credulous, mentally-challenged drones, masquerading as the American citizenry.
Reiterating history, Mr. James Madison, hypocrite, wealthy, slave owning elitist, and Fourth President of the United States was the brilliant author of the ridiculous document called the “Bill of Rights”, which contain the First through Tenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of AmericaIt is my intention to prove conclusively at the end of each essay that all of them are lies, cunningly crafted as a smokescreen to mesmerize feckless idiots, seducing the credulous into believing that they have “inalienable rights” given to them by some sort of god. Considering there is no proof that god exists, it is safe to assume that god does not exist and never did exist. Expounding the preceding statement, it is evident that our “rights” come from the clever, talking APE called man, and are easily negated by the clever, talking APE called man, by using FORCE, either covertly, through legislation, or overtly, by employing physical persuasion. Oh well, so much for god and rights of man, I guess. Cynically summarizing, is plainly obvious that the American citizenry possessing firearms is a grave threat and very present danger to the evolving Federal and State fascist tyrannies. Therefore, the Second Amendment must, and will be negated by those in power to enable the tyranny to progress further

For example, while perusing the Internet, I have noticed that a group of evident government paid shills are plainly stating that everyone should give up their guns, due to the Federal Government possessing tanks and other superior weapons, with which they will subjugate the people by force. Psychologically, such remarks are tactical; they are a threat, and are being employed by those in power in order to intimidate and demoralize an already alienated population into feeling hopeless. Such clumsy tactics won’t work, and have been tried before, across history. What individuals with such ignorant worldviews do not realize is that governments exist at the WHIM of the CITIZENRY, not vice versa. People with nothing left to lose and everything to gain are not cowered by the threats of those individuals they consider intractable enemies – a cornered rat will fight a fucking lion, even with no hope of survival, and a million rats will defeat and devour one. That is the key; one determined citizen can be defeated easily, a thousand determined citizens, not so easily; with a million determined citizens – success and “regime change” of whatever type is virtually certain. 

Citing our blood-drenched history as proof, the ultimate goal of the cunning, talking APE called man is for a select group of greedy apes to gain POWER and control over the masses, using any means, so the masses can be exploited by those in power – to facilitate the pursuance of whatever perceived want or need that is desired by the controlling group, which has always been wealth, in varying forms – be it goats, gold, silver, slaves, ships, whores, wildebeests, or whatever is considered “valuable” at the time. Those in power can and will use anything to justify their lofty and exalted positions – invoking their perceived intelligence, the need for public safety; “science”, as it is so-called today, e.g., global warming and its ugly sister, climate change, or by even invoking god – when they are truly desperate and have no recourse, other than death. All of the above, contrived measures are very effective at duping dronelike clods, for the most part, until the shit hits the fan, then, all bets are off. Regardless of temporary success, given enough time, coupled with oppression of the masses, the masses revolt, a vicious bloodbath ensues and the victors establish a new government, which immediately sets out to accomplish the very same task that the vanquished regime pursued – to have power over and to control the masses, and to exploit them economically, for the exact same reasons.

Yes, the above could be considered a “Marxist” worldview – sue me.Anyway, the supposed worldviews of those gangsters presently running any nation doesn’t matter at all, whether they be capitalists, fascists, or communists, as long as the dronelike masses have something to believe in, like the easily convinced, dogmatic, gullible fools that they are. Autocratic statism and devotion to such is replacing religion; Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Mao’s Communist China, and the current United States of America are proof of that assertion. The only discernible differences in the above four entities is that the United States is promoting “friendly” fascism – wanton tyranny disguised as freedom, complete with a with a cynical motherfucking “happy face” plastered over wanton autocracy. Other than that there is no difference in execution of goals – subjugating and forcing the populace to adopt a particular worldview, to facilitate the agenda of the elitist vermin controlling and exploiting the masses. Then, when the masses being exploited finally wake up – things change – FAST, like an unstoppable wildfire. 

That’s all it takes, dear reader; the communist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks proved that nearly a century ago; just ask that exiled Trudovik Aleksandr Kerensky – after the Czar was deposed, he offered continuing war for the people, Lenin offered peace for a weary population. The battleship Aurora backed Lenin up, using her GUNS in the October Revolution. Yet another communist, Chairman Mao, said it quite succinctly: “All political power grows out of the barrel of a GUN”, and the worried, tyrannical, fascist despots running the United States today will resort to any kind of subterfuge to disarm and subjugate the citizenry, out of their very REAL fear of becoming the next Louis XVI, Czar Nicholas, or Nicolae Ceausescu. The amoral gangsters running this joint don’t want you to know these things – they make hundreds of thousands of dollars per annum running this moribund nation, while they LAUGH atYOU – how much do you make, and then PAY to them for your REAL labors, in TAXES, so they can live like KINGS over YOU?

Capitalism, communismhave you actually NOTICED – what difference is there? Vladimir Putin is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof ZIL limousines, while Barack Obama is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof Cadillac limousines – and YOU, a supposed “free citizen of the United States” drive around in some fucking old, common rusty junker Chevy or Nissan with 100,000 miles on it, wondering if the goddamned oil pump or alternator is going to take a shit and cost you a pile of money that you do not have. Hey, credit cards work, and you’d better make sure your insurance and tags are current too, or the pigs will collar you as a “criminal” and cost you even more bucks. Politicians and their ilk live in palatial mansions staffed by servants, you live in a mortgaged dump, at best, owned by a bank, or you rent an apartment owned by those like them; they have the best of everything, and pretty capped teeth, too – you have yellow dentures or rotten teeth at best. Funny thing is – YOU paid for their palatial mansions and their capped teeth, with YOUR taxes, that they BILKED from YOU, via their fellow gangsters at the IRS. If you don’t pay their “protection” in the form of TAXES – they steal what you own and then put you in prison so you can get fucked in your ass, in the name of, justice,  Jesus or whatever – what real difference is there between they and the MAFIA? They LAUGH at YOU, and me, like the parasitical vermin they are – but they are morbidly AFRAID, as the populace has GUNS. They must take them away, at any cost, including your death.

One of my very favorite movies is “Nicholas and Alexandra”, from 1971 – especially the end, where the entire pampered “Royal Family” is mercilessly slaughtered by the vengeful Bolsheviks – along with the wonderful YouTube videos of Ceausescu and his cunt wife Elena being shot to death on Christmas Day, 1989. I actually laughed at them; I never had a better “Christmas present”, ever – seeing that despotic asshole and his wife coldly knocked off with Kalashnikovs as one would dispatch a rabid dog. Call me sadistic if you like, but I truly enjoy seeing elitists like Louis XVI, Nicholas Romanov or that bastard Ceausescu get exactly what they deserve; I make no apologies for it and I never will. If I live long enough I plan to enjoy watching videos depicting such wonderful occurrences in the good old USA, playing over YouTube for my viewing pleasure, while smiling at the carnage like a vindictive demon.

Enough lengthy diatribe for now – in continuation of this series over the arbitrary date of 2014, CE, I shall also prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that most other amendments adopted after the Fourteenth Amendment were passed to ERODE and DESTROY freedom, with other selected amendments being either patently obtuse, e.g., Amendment XVIII, or put forth in a cynical attempt to thwart revolt, e,g,. Amendment XXVI, adopted during the Vietnam war.Below, the text of the Second Amendment, verbatim:


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Analysis of the Second Amendment:

Quite plainly, the citizens of the United States ARE the militia, and those citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to keep weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) within their homes and on their persons, and citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to bear weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) if necessary, i.e., USE (e.g., clubs, knives, swords crossbows, ball bats and specifically firearms) for target practice, huntingself-defense and even to defend themselves from governmental tyranny. Further, according to the Second Amendment, Congress MAY NOT promulgate laws that limit or “infringe” the exercise of a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms, period. For the remainder of this essay, I shall only specifically refer to firearms, as they are the very core of the Second Amendment.

At least that’s what the Second Amendment SAYS, but it is, after all, only sophistry written on a page of parchment, it cannot enforce itself, unlike those well-protected, well-armed individuals who make up a government, who can, will and do enforce their will, for good or ill, upon the hapless citizenry. 

The Founding Fathers and others agree with the above interpretation of the Second Amendment, complete, verbatim citations would take up a lot of my time and needless space, so I shall post convenient links for the reader’s perusal:

I submit the above links are enough to prove the intention of the Founding Fathers with regard to individual citizens possessing firearms for personal usefor hunting, for self-defense, and for prevention of governmental tyranny. Some may not believe my assertion, and may choose to split hairs, arrogantly stating that some of the sites are “biased” or “fringe” sites – who the fuck cares – the quotations of the Founding Fathers are their very words, they are accurate, and can be found elsewhere on the Internet – simply look their quotes up yourself on other sites if you doubt my veracity.

Now, using all of the above as a premise, I shall show the reader that the Second Amendment is a LIE. I will accomplish this task using several dialectical steps, as follows:

1) Rights of any type are not inherent, nor do they come from a god, they are given to the citizens by the governing body, and can be easily modified, or even taken away by the governing body if deemed necessary or expedient, by using “laws”, or force.

Expounding on that premise, and illustrating the unabashed hypocrisy of the Founders of this nation; at the time of the Founding Fathers, niggers had no rights at all; they weren’t citizens of anywhere and they were even viewed as animals, by said hypocrites. Then, after the Civil War, they were given rights by those in power who won the war. You see, it wasn’t any god that endowed niggers with rights, nor did their rights magically appear from the ethers – they were GIVEN their rights by other PEOPLE, specifically, Northern whiteys, on a whim, to arrogantly rub the defeated Southerner’s noses in it, so to speak.

Was it “right” or “good” to do any of the above? Who the fuck knows – morality and ethics are completely arbitrarydependent on the given situation – might makes right, and that’s all that counts, or ever did count, in reality, regardless of any rhetorical sophistry stating otherwise.

2) Rights of any type are not “inalienable”, considering that martial law “suspends” our supposed “god given rights” – just ask folks like Abraham Lincoln, and the Territorial Governor of Hawaii, Joseph Poindexter. “Rights” vanished like a fart in the wind – with the proclamations of MEN, that is, Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Poindexter.

3) Several US states and localities during the 1800’s attempted to interfere with gun ownership and the use thereof, promulgating “concealed weapons” laws, but most of those laws were simply a nuisance. However, the fact that they succeeded in passing such legislation exemplifies the Second Amendment for what it IS –  just another cunning lie for credulous drones to believe in. Such legalistic legerdemain was only the beginning of the “slippery slope” that is leading to outright CONFISCATION of legally owned firearms in Connecticut – a state supposedly governed by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

So much for your risible, non-existent “right” to “keep and bear” arms, citizen, or more aptly, subject – I maintain that the Second Amendment IS a fucking LIE.

4) With the Federal Government usurping more power originally delegated to the People or the States (the Ninth and Tenth Amendments) in the Twentieth Century, the Congress of the United States of America has, since 1934, blatantly infringed on the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms, starting with the “National Firearms Act”, signed into law by the cripple, in both body and mind, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The “Gun Control Act” of 1968 followed, signed into law by the crooked, amoral megalomaniac Lyndon Baines Johnson, with the “Brady Handgun Violence Act” of 1993, and the “Federal Assault Weapons Ban” of 1994, signed into law by the mendacious whoremonger, William Jefferson Clinton. 

Links to each “ACT” are provided below:

Although I despise both Democrats and Republicans equally, as both are little more than elected gangsters, it is rather odd that all of the above laws were promoted, passed and promulgated by DEMOCRATS, the vociferous, self-proclaimed “defenders of the Constitution”. Oh well, hypocrisy and mendaciousness are nothing new – just look at the corrupt Roman Senate at the time of Cicero or the utterly disgusting Greek “Democratic” Senate that condemned Socrates to DEATH. Incidentally, the same goes for the major wars of the Twentieth Century, i.e., World Wars One and Two; they were prosecuted by DEMOCRATS, together with their presiding over lesser wars like Korea and Vietnam, but that’s another story altogether. Yes, the current conflicts we are in, e.g., Afghanistan, or have recently exited from, i.e., Iraq, are the products of Republican Administrations, both prosecuted with the overwhelming support of Democrats, mind you; that only proves there is no difference at all between the Democrat or Republican parties of today.

5) Another convenient link, illustrating the concept of the “slippery slope” is now presented for the reader to peruse, further showing before all who read that the Second Amendment is a LIE.

6) Current Goebbelsian propaganda, created by cunning authors to dupe the young into a contrived interpretation of the Second Amendment, supported by the United States Federal Government, as is illustrated by the links below:

Here is an op-ed, from the New York Times, supporting the Goebbelsian rewrite of the Second Amendment:

Lastly, here, for the reader, is an article of blatant, biased, contrived Goebbelsian LIES about the Second Amendment, with opposing comments destroying the author, Thom Hartmann’s, stance:

Analysis completed, I submit, by citing and comparing the above theses, derived  from eight disparate premises, and with only the written words of the Second Amendment as an opposing antithesis, that a credible synthesis can be quickly deduced, with minimal effort:

The Second Amendment is CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN as the goddamned LIE that it is.

I again invite anyone, I even dare you, from drooling drone to Constitutional Scholar, to PROVE my terse assertion wrong, by using FACTS, backed up with supporting evidence in the form of accredited, or at least provable, citations. The onus is upon you to prove me wrong, and, if such is proven, I shall publicly concede defeat at your hands, and post notations of such defeat in a later essay.

Just wait until I prove the idiotic Third Amendment as a goddamned, motherfucking LIE – that’s coming up next. I will succeed in doing that by employing the same legalistic cunning and legerdemain that lawyers use in “proving” that “money can commit a crime”, or that “corporations are persons”, which the former cannot and the latter is not, in any universe that is populated by those considered SANE. Both are logical fallacies and absurd contrivances that would be laughed at by those like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, but what the hell – man is the measure of all things, including definition – just ask Protagoras, or that old, silly kike Noam Chomsky.



%d bloggers like this: