A Tale Told by an IDIOT, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying NOTHING

March 23, 2014

I told the fool who insisted upon contacting me that I would post his or her inane remarks for all to see, verbatim, and I am fulfilling that promise. Fool is definitely the proper word to describe my feckless adversary, considering the repetitive, obtuse qualities of his or her remarks.

I shall intersperse deep analysis and associated commentary between each remark.

I considered such a post years ago when a fainthearted Muslim sandnigger fucked with me, but the faggot disappeared, so I didn’t bother with it.

This time – I AM BOTHERING; I delight in making examples of idiots, and my friend Anonymous, who is too cowardly to reveal his or her name, is the epitome of an idiot.

Dialogue follows, with the Anonymous posters remarks highlighted:

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:06
I guess it depends on whose constitution you’re talking about. / I find some to be a little more worthwhile.

Even at this point I find it impossible to believe that an individual would be so stupid to post meaningless drivel such as the above. I sincerely doubt that the poster has ever read much of anything, let alone a Constitution.

Conway 20 March, 2014 20:22
Well, I think it should be quite clear that I have been writing about the Constitution of the United States of America. I have perused other constitutions as well, and none I have read so far addresses personal liberty and freedom from governmental interference as well as Madison’s Constitution does.

Too bad that it is only sophistry, words on a page, and not enforced as it was originally intended. I submit that the same goes for any other constitution, as man is the measure of all things, and is, unfortunately, prone to hypocrisy. The arrogant, elitist criminals running the United States today are absolute proof of that.

Here, I was attempting to be polite, thinking that possibly the individual was a foreigner, and clearly pointed out that I was writing about the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:38
Do you not think actual enforcement of said constitution would lead to a number of someones getting hurt, and does that not concern you in the least.

This remark is either stupid, contrived, or the individual does not understand the meaning of the word “enforcement” with regard to the Bill of Rights. Then again, perhaps he or she was serious, thinking that enforcement of the Bill of Rights would “hurt” the elitists and their jackbooted pigs, duly charged with keeping the rest of us in line.

Anonymous 20 March, 2014 20:49
You don’t think it’s been enforced? How much more enforcing needs to take place? How many years, how many tears? Curious.

This remark seems to prove that the individual is a cretin, considering that “enforcing” the Bill of Rights would lead to less “tears”, considering that the people’s rights would be respected by the authorities.

Conway 20 March, 2014 23:27
Apparently, you do not understand what I have written.

The Constitution of the United States of America is not being enforced, and people are suffering because of that. 

Liberty, freedom and the full exercise of individual rights are the objective of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The elitists running this nation do not want that, and never did.

This needs no further explanation.

Conway 20 March, 2014 23:32
It’s definite – you do not understand what I have written at all, your reading comprehension skills are lacking. 

That, or you are deliberately trying to waste my time by posting a nonsensical argument. 

Have a good evening.

Strangely, I missed his second reply until a little later, and his/her latter remark convinced me that the individual was incapable of understanding the essay.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 04:59
No, Im the only one on here attempting to make sense of what the fick you’re saying. And talk to you. Again, it seems, the only one to do so.

It is obvious that the individual cannot make sense of what I was saying due to either not reading it, or not possessing the intellect to understand what I was relating. That, or he/she was simply fucking with me, which, after reflection, is probably the case. Notice the missing punctuation in the contraction; and the misspelled “fuck”. Then, the individual wrongfully assumed that I was interested in conversation with them, when the only thing I was and am interested in is having someone challenge or refute my position in the essay.

Conway 21 March, 2014 13:27
My dear Anonymous,

Okay, you asked for it.

Your poorly composed responses to my current polemical essay are little more than meaningless, incoherent drivel. Apparently you have not even read it, judging from your obtuse remarks. Further, I sincerely doubt that you could understand the article even if you did read it; I suspect that you do not have the intellectual capacity for such a task.

I candidly wager that you are some bizarre type of troll or perhaps a lower level NSA employee, too inept to even create a profile for reference, making a pathetic attempt to get a rise out of me for whatever reason. You are wasting your time, others have tried, and you have missed the mark by miles. 

Moving on, judging from your writing “style”, which I believe to be contrived, you are probably the same individual who showed up a few years back on the Wagist site and followed me here. If that is so, I suggest you find someone else to play with; so far I find you ignorant and quite unchallenging.

That said, I write for catharsis, not popularity; you are judging others by your own criteria, and have made an inaccurate value judgment with regard to my intention. Try the Hegelian Dialectic next time; I have instructed the reader how to employ that aspect of critical thinking in past essays.

My challenge to you and any other reader is to prove my assertions in the above and other essays as inaccurate, or “wrong”, and to prove such charges by using cited facts, historical precedent, and case law. If you can accomplish that – I wish you luck in doing so.

That is all I am after, period – nothing else matters here. 

If you cannot refute my position, simply say so, and move onto something else.

Regards,

Conway

This needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:41
You are the most unpleasant human being I’ve ever come across, and I truly regret ever given time amd money to you. The waste of a life was spent trying to give anything of value to you. Don’t contact me again. and go fucking die, you walking abortion.

Notice the extreme anger at my reply, which was not complimentary, yes, but my response was civil, for the most part. 

Then, as if I should care, the individual informed me that I was “the most unpleasant human being they had ever come across”. I wager he/she doesn’t get out very much, or lives in an asylum of sorts or perhaps a monastery. Then the poster goes on to write “I truly regret ever given time amd (sic) money to you”. Note the grammatical mistake as well; I suspect anger is ruling his or her thoughts, or perhaps the poster is simply uneducated. The time and money remark I find enigmatic, considering that the time involved in interacting with me was minuscule, and no exchange of specie was involved. Then, in a ridiculous attempt to manipulate the conversation, the poster wrote further incoherent drivel, telling me not to “contact them again”, which I never have, and ended their rant with sophomoric expletives.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:43
The waste of time comes from thinking that you actually had something of importance to say, and trying to make sense of it. I don’t plan on doing that again.

Whether my words are important remains to seen; notice the poor word usage in the beginning of the the poster’s sentence. It is fortunate that he/she didn’t plan on trying to make sense of the essay, as he or she is evidently incapable of making sense of much of anything, including having the ability to pour piss out of a boot, with the directions written on the heel.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 13:50
That means stay away from my friends and family too, creepy pathetic stalking freak.

This remark is thoroughly puerile. Apparently, it was meant to put me on the defensive; it actually made me laugh.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:04
Please, go see a psychiatrist before you harm yourself, or others.

I actually meant that, the individual is obviously disturbed, judging from the “goofy” remarks so far. The disjointed, repetitive replies show that the poster has obsessive tendencies, and does not like being dismissed as irrelevant by anyone, even by an old fart like me who writes vitriolic polemical essays on an unknown blog for the sheer hell of it.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:00
My dear Anonymous,

I never have contacted you – you contacted me. You could have avoided that by not bothering, but you insisted. Ergo, it is your fault that you are pissed off, and that I am laughing at you.

You have effortlessly proven my point before the entire world; you are an ignorant individual who doesn’t even recall the idiotic drivel that you have composed. With each post you make you bury yourself further; good riddance to bad rubbish, I say.

I also notice that you cannot refute one thing that I wrote in the essay – I win the argument by default, and you are defeated.

Further, you have never given time or money to me, you don’t know who I am and you never will, and as far as I am concerned, you can go fuck yourself, cretin.

Angry much?

Regards,

Conway

My reply needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:04
You got that right. I don’t . Don’t plan on spending anymore time and money to figure it out either. You forgot the stay the fuck away from me and my family, however, you creepy walking aberration. .

This individual, the subject, is a very young, lonely person, 18 to 25, tops; I seriously doubt that they have a family, unless it is “Mother and Dad”, in that order. 

If the poster is male – a classic, infantile deviate, Freudian Oedipus Complex is indicated, with probable sexual inexperience, other than occasional masturbation with dominatrix overtones and guilt feelings afterward; possible homosexual tendencies as well, subject’s attraction to men is subconscious, but evident, based on obsessive interaction and gravitation toward male or masculine figures.

If female, the subject is an overweight, rejected, easily orgasmic virgin, addicted to clitoral masturbation without penetration, due to guilt feelings; headed for spinsterhood due to unrealistic standards. Often sits quietly, unobserved, with the heel of her foot in her crotch, preferring one over the other dependent on dexterity for masturbation purposes, young male celebrities the object of her fantasies. 

Please note the clumsy, second attempt to put me on the defensive, with the childish ending of the reply.

My evaluation of the gender of subject: 93% chance that the poster is male, or perhaps an extremely masculine lesbian; intersex hermaphrodite possibility as well; XXY or XYY karyotype possible. Further remarks on the subject will refer to he/she exclusively as “he, his or him”.

Ethnicity undefinable at this time, suspected Caucasoid of southern European extraction.

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:09
You are the obtuse cretin who keeps making a fool of yourself – I’m actually enjoying this.

I’m laughing at you too – mentally ill individuals usually provoke laughter.

Incidentally – if you “know” me personally – what is my REAL NAME?

Regards,

Conway

Yes, I was abusive toward the subject, as he was intent upon the delusional idea that he knew me personally, so the subject was challenged on that premise. Subject then became ambiguous, and then attempted to assign “supernatural” qualities to the object of his adversary. Paranoid delusion is evident. (See below, i.e. “Legion”)

Conway 21 March, 2014 14:13
Incidentally – I think I’ll do an article on YOU and your stupid remarks, posted en toto, with my responses, so the entire goddamned planet can see you for the absolute fucking idiot that you are.

Enjoy burying yourself further.

Have a nice day.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:19
Legion is your real name you fork toungued pig. Is this your newest incarnation? Wow this newest facet I doubt is going to make you the money your other fake fraudulent personas did.

Supernatural fantasies, based on Judeo-Christian and Muslim dogmas, 78% chance that subject is fundamentalist Christian, e.g., primitive Baptist, Pentecostal, or Seventh Day Adventist. 15% chance that subject is Muslim, possibly of Druze or Sufi sect; 5% chance that subject is of Jewish faith, i.e., orthodox Kabbalist. Sanity of subject now in question. Overall percentage estimate of fanatical religious belief: 98%. Spelling mistake noted, perhaps due to stupidity.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 14:22
Why not. You’ve al
Ready written about me, my family, my friends, not to mention how many other people you’ve stalked over the years. Go for it.

Subject now displays primitive fear/threat reaction, easily predictable, with regard to family, friends, et cetera; fabricated “threat” to dear ones noted and cataloged accordingly as a defensive posture. Subject continues to imply that I am a supernatural being from mythical place called hell, a creature named “Legion”, taken from New Testament Bible, likely KJV or Douai translation, subject’s reasoning based on archaic superstition. Please note the odd mistake in spelling  – “alReady”.

Anonymous 21 March, 2014 15:30
Put the other comments pig. I own your sorry evil ass and you know it.

Subject seems to think that old fart Conway is entirely devoted to him, and that my existence is dependent on his every word. Note the “pig” reference, either taken from my polemics, or perhaps employed from his personal, superstitious worldview. Percentiles have changed, if subject is fundamentalist Christian, a Seventh Day Adventist tops the probability, with Muslim Sufi coming second, and Jewish Orthodox third. Probability of subject being an atheist: less than one percent.

Conway 21 March, 2014 20:30
If you are indeed serious, and are not just mentally masturbating for some kind of puerile lark, you seem to delight in burying yourself. Alright; I’ll play your little game, though I do realize that you have a very limited capacity for debate, if one can call this unproductive series of ludicrous exchanges a debate.

For example, you have absolutely no idea as to who I am, and your ridiculous, inane replies reflect that fact. That noted – kindly tell me what my given name is, here, and in what State of the Union that I reside in, that is, if you “know” me so well, which you do not, and never will. You are being mendacious, in other words a liar, for someone of your limited intellect, and if you actually do believe that you know me, you are in fact delusional. Considering your words; I suggest a visit to a psychiatrist, coupled with appropriate doses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. Such compounds may prove effective for assisting you in dealing with your delusions – do you hallucinate as well?

Try lithium.

Further, your spelling is absolutely atrocious, and your grammar leaves a lot to be desired. You can barely compose a coherent sentence, and your obvious anger at my blithe dismissal of your ill-thought replies only makes the situation worse – for you. Incidentally, if you had even half a brain, you could easily find my given name and where I reside from various posts I have made over the Internet – I’ll give you a clue – the initials of my first and last name fall between the letters of “F” and “N” in the English alphabet.

Oh well, this may help increase your ire – I don’t care in the least of what you may think of me, and I dare you to make even one attempt to refute anything that I alleged in the article, which you cannot, due to not even understanding anything I have written. I actually find you entertaining, to a degree, and your remarks have made me laugh out loud. For that, I thank you.

Referring to your pathetic attempt at assigning personal nomenclature to an individual you will never meet – your laughable Biblical references from the Gospels of the New Testament only reveal you to be some variety of idiotic, dogmatic religious fanatic, who believes in silly, non-existent creatures like demons, angels, and gods. That is your problem, all the belief in the universe will not bring such entities into existence. Further, your foul mouth and ad hominem remarks make you a hypocrite, which is very typical of the “Christians” I have met, along with other mentally disturbed fanatics like Muslims.

Look for my article on you, exemplifying you and your words before the entire world as a drooling cretin.

Keep replying, you are only pouring gasoline on a fire. Warning: If your replies are not sufficiently obtuse, and entertaining, I will simply delete them and be done with you.

Have a good evening,

Conway

This post needs no further explanation.

Anonymous 22 March, 2014 05:00
You’re hardly one to prostelyze about hypocrisy, fraud. How did you make your money? Not by acting like the pig you portraying at the moment.

This post is probing, the subject is attempting to make me justify my position, without any compelling reason, ergo, observer ignored it. He cunningly asks about my livelihood; I have repeatedly stated that I built my position by servicing electronics in the past, along with trading equities in hard commodities. Then he compares me to a porcine creature, without having any effect, as I could not care less about his view of me. Refer to above analysis regarding the superstitious, with regard to pigs.

Conway 22 March, 2014 05:26
Ah yes, you are here – I am very glad of that, and I thank you very much for your response. You made me mentally cum with your latest inane reply; I am quite satisfied; I relish in your gross stupidity. Keep feeding me, you fucking idiot.

Your latest fecklessness easily passed my litmus test for both obtusity and entertainment; therefore I approved it. Fuck up and I will delete further replies and silence you at my leisure – you must pass my tests from now on.

As a public service, I will inform you when I decide to silence your squawkings, should you fail to be entertaining.

I have proven you for the utter superstitious fool that you are. I will even tell you the title of my post devoted to YOU: ” A Tale Told by an Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing”.

You definitely signify nothing.

I have already written the outline, I’m simply waiting for you to post more entertainment; I’ve even posted another essay in the meantime, devoted to your moronic, inept, megalomanical nigger jackanapes.

Please, I appeal to you, keep burying yourself, I’m loving it.

Kind Regards,

Conway

Anonymous 22 March, 2014 06:21
I know the name you’ve decided to adopt, after challenging me to read your lanced, puss filled posts. It is however, not the name I originally associate with you, is it.

The adjectival definition of the the word “asshole” defines the subject’s idiotic post, with allusions to “Legion” again; note how the subject uses a repeated “s” in his clumsy attempt to spell “pus”, a purulent exudation of dead bacteria and white blood cells from a common abscess.

Conway 22 March, 2014 14:16
DANGER: MORON DETECTED.

I’m sorry, but your latest post, which I published for you, was completely obtuse, though not sufficiently entertaining. Therefore, I am forced to do something that I have never done before on this blog – I shall no longer approve further comments from you.

You have written enough to enable me to easily identify your peculiar prose, and even if you attempt to alter it, I will still be able to recognize, and delete it. Let’s just say that I have a patented “moron detector”, and leave it at that.

Love,

Conway

With great regret, I had to do this – I enjoy sparring with people, but even I have to draw a line somewhere – the poster is a delusional religious fanatic, probably an insane, fucking idiot, not worth my time.

Predictably, the attracted, obsessed, latent homosexual dummy had to post yet another inane rant – which I refused to approve; my stipulations binding on me as well, but I shall post them here for continuity, to show him for the fool that he is:

How apt. Free speech further limited by you, While you prattle away at the rights this country no longer affords people. And angry that once upon a time you felt That i limited free speech. All while having a fit that I dared try talking to you. Typical. Don’t worry, you too have a pattern that seems to be your m.o. 

Conway’s take: Sour grapes from Aesop’s Fables. Notice the ridiculous capitalization errors. The subject in question, a feckless idiot, doesn’t even understand the concept of “free speech” as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America. Free Speech applies to GOVERNMENTS, not individual people, or businesses. I reserve the right to refuse to publish the inane replies of morons, using my patented “moron detector”, and our friend anonymous is the absolute epitome of a fucking moron with the collective intellect of a ten pound bag of russet potatoes.

In fairness, I will give the deviant subject, an obviously obsessed, insane individual, a chance to reply, but only on this post – any remarks on earlier or forthcoming essays will be summarily deleted.

Go ahead, subject, I guarantee that you will have free reign here, to refute my analysis of YOU – I give you my word as a man that I will publish whatever you have to say, at MY LEISURE, but only on this particular post. Beware that I will slap you down accordingly with each post that you make. Take my bait, you goddamned fool – come on, you cowardly pussy, I DARE YOU to fuck with me – I will DESTROY YOU, with no holds barred. When you do not respond, as I flawlessly predict, I will repeatedly make note of that too in later essays.

Analysis and prognosis: Subject Anonymous is a goddamned deranged, delusional fruitcake and a dangerous, superstitious freak, who should be confined indefinitely in an institution, to ensure the safety of others.

ADDENDUM: The lunatic took my bait, and posted further absurdities, as follows:

Get it through your fucking head, you evil fucking stalking pig. I’m not your fucking dog, go fuckiñg die, diseased piece of shit. Stay gone from me and my family. 

You ARE my dog, motherfucker – bark for me, then heel. If I decide to become charitable, I’ll order you to fetch a dried up turd on my back lawn shat from the ass of my trained ocelot. Be nice, or I’ll order you to fetch fresh turds shat from the asses of my Boudreaux bulldogs.

The subject is indeed dangerous – he is delusional, and should be forcibly confined before he hurts himself or others.

Kind Regards,

Conway

More Incompetence from the Arrogant, Inept, Idiotic Jackanapes

March 22, 2014

Between trading stocks, sparring with imbeciles and creating vicious polemics ripping apart the Bill of Rights, proving them for the absolute lies that they are, I have gleefully watched the obtuse, narcissistic eight-ball, Barack “jackanapes” Obama, make a complete fool of himself across the entire goddamned planet. His feckless sidekicks, Dolt Biden and Frankenstein Kerry, have only added to the hilarity, completely powerless to do anything about their new Lex Luthor – Vladimir Putin, who marched the Russian Army unopposed onto the Crimean peninsula, an area important to Russian interests, and none of the business of the meddling United States.

Outclassed in every maneuver, Jackanapes Obama, an oafish dilettante so far out of his league that he might as well be governing from Pluto, has been definitively shown for the two-faced hypocrite that he is by Putin and company. The moolie, continuing the idiotic actions of dunderhead George W. Bush, has armies still sitting in Afghanistan, with lesser forces parked in Iraq; we bombed Libya in 2011, and still have armed forces in South Korea, Germany and Japan, among other places. Frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog, warlord Obama even wanted to bomb Syria, assisting our “enemies” in Al-Qaeda to overthrow Bashir al-Assad, for whatever INSANE reason. In a clear example of “do as I say and not as I do”, the hypocritical jackanapes started mouthing off about how “wrong” Putin and his cohorts are, apparently due to the US wearing “white hats”, while the Russians sport black astrakhans. Double standards nauseate me, but when considering the dismal ethical record of US politicians, especially over the past century, I am not surprised in the least at their hypocritical actions.

After Mr. Putin annexed Crimea, with the population overwhelmingly approving, exercising their right of SELF-DETERMINATION, the inept jackanapes decided to impose meaningless “personal sanctions”, whatever they are or may be, on select members of Putin’s cabinet, together with other cronies, in a dubious attempt to “punish” them for not kowtowing to his shrill demands. So, what does any of that mean – that Putin can’t use Netflix or his American Express card? Further, exactly what items does the United States produce that Russia or any of its citizens would need, or even want?

The answer is – NOTHING. Russia doesn’t need the United States for anything; neither does China, for that matter. With the United States becoming increasingly irrelevant in world affairs, US politicians must employ every conceivable tactic to ensure their continued hegemony upon the rest of the world – even in affairs that are absolutely NONE of our fucking business. Now the jackanapes’ rhetoric is becoming even more ridiculous, making idle threats with regard to “economic sanctions”.

EARTH TO JACKANAPES OBAMA: Russia does not need us, and just because we don’t buy their borscht doesn’t mean that their market will dry up – there are plenty of other buyers, and your silly economic sanctions will accomplish NOTHING AT ALL. Perhaps that will be the crowning achievement of an Administration that has accomplished NOTHING of value since entering office, other than wasting trillions of dollars, and eroding the rights of the American people – just wait until Russia decides to dump our worthless T-Bills – gold, silver and oil will go to the MOON.

The Russians countered in a cynical tit-for-tat, barring nine soft-palmed, elitist gangsters from entering Russia – elected criminals like senile John McCain, crooked Harry Reid, drunk John Boehner, Robert Menendez, Mary Landrieu, and Daniel Coates, along with three of Obama’s closest, brown-nosed sycophants. I wouldn’t want pieces of shit like that in my nation either, unfortunately we are stuck with those amoral, self-serving bastards – I say bravo to the Russians.

Here’s the list of banned criminals:

http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/newsline/177739554DA10C8B44257CA100551FFE

All that noted, Jackanapes Obama’s impotent attempt at intimidation has only elicited LAUGHTER from his Russian adversaries, and the Russians know that America has no stomach for starting World War Three over something as trivial as the Crimean peninsula.

I’m laughing too - like a jackal.

Regards,

Conway

A Nation, Founded on LIES – Part Three UPDATE

March 20, 2014

It was my intent to post this as an addendum to the original post, but those few who may have already read it are unlikely to re-read it, and the following incident is very important with regard to my contention, and proven factual assertion – that the Third Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America is a goddamned, motherfucking lie. Therefore, I will post this information separately; I was made aware of the following disgusting event via an email sent to me by a supporter over my private address. I must confess that I was remiss in my research, not having noticed that a contemporaneous example of my contention was available to display for my readers. Oh well, I’m an old bastard; meaner than a goddamn rattler and twice as deadly, but I am fallible too – perhaps I’m growing senile.

That brings us to a current example of Third Amendment violations by the powers that be, courtesy of my supporter, not that it really means anything, considering that the Third Amendment has not been “incorporated” against the States: The case of Mr. Anthony Mitchell, et al, of 367 Eveningside Avenue, Henderson Nevada 89012. I woefully submit that this case will go nowhere, due to the cunning machinations of shysters and historical precedent, just like when I was dubbed a “drug dealer” - for simply carrying MY MONEY on MY PERSON. Yes, I will NEVER forget that, for as long as I live – ALL cops are PIGS, and I laugh like a goddamned jackal whenever any of them are killed, for whatever reason.

On 10 July 2011, at 10:45 AM, porcine swine called Anthony Mitchell and stated they needed to commandeer his domicile to facilitate the arrest of a “domestic violence” suspect at an unspecified domicile adjacent to his domicile. Mitchell refused, as was his right, and hung up the phone, confident that his home was his castle, and inviolable by by the authorities.

He was WRONG.

Suck on these links - go ahead, tell me I’m a fucking liar, I have yet to get even ONE missive refuting my assertions that our “rights” are LIES:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/8/nevada-cops-sued-storming-home-they-wanted-lookout/

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/jul/11/constitutional-scholars-take-notice-lawsuit-agains/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/07/anthony-mitchell-lawsuit-third-amendment-_n_3557431.html

https://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_Police_Department

http://randazza.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/third-amendment-case-in-nevada/

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/07/07/a-misguided-third-amendment-case-in-nevada/#.UyqhXKhdWSo

I did not write the above articles – oh well, either everyone is a coward, or no one can refute my assertions that the entire Bill of Rights is a goddamned, motherfucking LIE, not worth the parchment it was written on.

Returning to the case:

Shortly thereafter, near noon, five jackbooted SWAT thugs showed up at Mr. Anthony Mitchell’s house, and beat on his door in the name of the law, demanding that he “open up” for the duly sworn, armed gangsters. Undaunted by the lack of a response, as Mr. Mitchell was on the phone, conversing with his parents, they broke his door down with a battering ram in the name of baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie. Entering his home after the door was smashed down, the armed invaders drew guns on him and ordered him to the floor of his home, while calling him a rube, motherfucker, or cocksucker, or whatever pigs currently use to intimidate their victims – all in the name of freedom, of course. Rubbing it in, the arrogant, victorious gestapo freebooters pepper sprayed him, while he was helpless and prone on the floor, in the name of Chevrolet. Then they did the same fucking thing to his hapless dog, perhaps in the name of Mack Trucks, you know – the “bulldog” ornament sitting on the hoods of highway tractors of that American brand name.

Drunk on their power, the duly sworn, badged pirates then “arrested” Mr. Mitchell, for “obstructing an officer” and dragged him from his home to their pigsty, in the name of Betsy Ross, George Washington, and Chairman Mao. Strike the Ross and Washington invocations, as fucking Chairman Mao only apples in this case. Then they fucked up his furniture, and set up their “command post”, so they could conduct “surveillance” on the nearby domicile of the “domestic violator”.

Meanwhile, pigs also invaded the backyard of 362 Eveningside Avenue, Henderson, Nevada, 89012, home of Mr. Michael Mitchell, and his wife Linda, parents of Mr Anthony Mitchell. Mrs. Mitchell answered, and the duly sworn pirates demanded entry. Mrs Mitchell refused, and the pigs shoved her aside and entered her domicile in the name of freedom. Dragging her from her home, one pig began “searching” though her purse for “evidence”, without a warrant, as is specified by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, which is a “right” incorporated against the States by the Warren Supreme Court, in the case Mapp vs. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

Then the pigs wandered about the latter Mitchell’s “compound”, searching for whatever, consumed potables within, dumped contents from their refrigerator to the floor of their kitchen, and QUARTERED theirselves within the domicile.

Mr. Michael Mitchell, father of Anthony Mitchell, was “arrested” as well, and ferried to the pigsty in an oink-mobile. Both were “booked” for “obstructing an officer”. Father Michael Mitchell and and son Anthony were held for nine hours of their mortal fucking lives for no legitimate goddamned reason at all, by jackbooted PIRATES, who think it is their RIGHT to be obnoxious, bullying assholes, and who think they have the RIGHT to threaten anyone who gets in their way - with abuse, arrest, or even death.

Curiously enough, all charges against the Mitchells were dropped, as anyone with half a fucking brain knows they would have been acquitted anyway by a voir dired jury of their peers. The pigs tried to offer that in exchange for not being sued, as when I beat the “drug dealer” charges leveled against me – a judge actually telling a vociferous pig to shut up after he had adjudicated the case. Then the all-powerful State told me that unless I signed a form absolving them of all wrongdoing, they would simply STEAL my money that they took from me and I would have no recourse. It was a considerable sum in those days and I needed it for operating capital at my business. I could have sued but it would have taken years, and I would have received essentially the same amount after legal fees. One bird in hand is worth two in the bush, so I signed and reclaimed my hard-earned bucks from those fucking pirates. They still got away with stealing the tools out of my beat-up old rusty junker, toolbox and all. Yes, I have always driven used pieces of shit, new vehicles are not worth the capital invested; it is more prudent to invest surplus cash in equities.

I vividly recall the cloudy day when my funds were returned, they had offered a check earlier – I DEMANDED my CASH. My mouthpiece, a hook-nosed kike, told me that “a state check is the same as cash”. I said no, and that I wanted my money that they had taken from me. The next day, my funds were returned, in cash, sans a silver certificate which had been given to me decades earlier by my grandfather.

The Assistant State’s Attorney was there; he looked like the veritable personification of a limp-wristed, cocksucking fairy. As he handed me my funds, he said, “I’m sure you got this money by illegal means.” 

I frowned and replied, “Fuck you, douchebag.” 

My kike mouthpiece said, “You can’t talk to him that way – he’s the Assistant States Attorney!”

I looked at my lawyer, who had already been paid, and replied, “The fact that I just did proves that I can.” I then got up and left, and never spoke to that fawning, kike bastard again.

I’ll tell you one thing, reader – if I EVER get my revenge on them, it won’t be pretty. Like Roman Emperor Carinus, I would hunt those bastards down and then coldly crucify those nazi pigs, and laugh beneath their blood-soaked crosses as they died in exquisite agony, like a latter day Vlad the Impaler. I don’t forget, and I never forgive. I am not a Christian, and I am the one who will “take vengeance upon mine enemies”, given the chance. Incidentally, I have NO criminal record, unless you want to count a few “traffic tickets”, for having the unmitigated audacity to drive around in an ancient, rusted out, oil belching refugee from a goddamned car crusher.

Returning to the Mitchell case – does any of the above matter? No, the pigs didn’t fucking care, just like with my case of decades ago, and neither does our corrupt government that facilitates them. All they are interested in is POWER, and CONTROL over the PEOPLE. They don’t care whose “rights” are violated, as the Constitution is only sophistry; words on a page, written by man, and thus cannot enforce itself. The cunning monsters running this bankrupt joint know this, and so do I - toilet paper has more value; at least it is good for wiping shit from asses of either sex or clinging drops of piss from dripping cunts, whereas the Constitution is perhaps useful for lining birdcage floors, and little else.

My prognostication on the above case:

It will be quickly decided in the favor of the plaintiffs first; then appealed by the defendants and reversed by an appellate court in favor of the defendants, then it will be appealed to SCOTUS by the plaintiffs. SCOTUS will either refuse to hear the case, which is my wager, or will decide in the favor of the defendants, to maintain the status quo.

I would bet all that I own, to ANY gamester, double or nothing, that the Mitchells will LOSE their case in the end.

That’s “justice” for you, drone - get used to it, and kneel to your esteemed betters like the common serf that you are.

The elitists relishing in their Pyrrhic victory, soon after that, the United States of America will be wracked by insurrection, civil war, and revolution - a literal BLOODBATH - who the fuck knows how it will turn out, and who really cares? I don’t; I submit that anything, anarchy, libertarianism, communism, national socialism, or actually IMPLEMENTING the original CONSTITUTION of the United States of America, as INTENDED, is better than a laughable, fraudulent nation based on LIES, and run by CRIMINALS.

Then again, during the “dark time” the United States could be invaded and destroyed by outside influences; that’s what you get for ARROGANCE and DECADENCE. In that case, America will get what it DESERVES.

If the former scenario prevails, I truly hope that I live to see it, along with the attendant show trials of those defeated – and it won’t be those who started the insurrection, I assure you. Those with nothing to lose have everything to gain, history has proven that repeatedly. Three percent of the populace can topple this illegitimate regime, and send it to the flaming hell where it belongs. Sheer force of will shall triumph in the coming reckoning, and blood will run in the streets.

I plan to laugh manically at our “betters”, to their goddamned faces if I can, before they receive the vicious justice they deserve.

Regards,

Conway

A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part Two

March 11, 2014

Well, I wager my preceding post woke someone up – hits went up like a bat out of hell, courtesy of my good friends at the NSA or the CIA, or maybe even the FBI. I wager someone, somewhere, doesn’t like what I have to say at all, even though there isn’t one thing they can do about it, legallySearching for anything that could be construed as a threat to anyone, they finally closed the page in bitter disappointment, angrily conceding that your friend Conway, whose true identity they already know, chooses his words very, very carefully. 
 
That aside, speculating further, perhaps they’ll send the IRS after me for daring to tell the truth about this cadaverous farce of a nation, or maybe they’ll elect to use the Secret Service, in a pathetic attempt at intimidation, sternly accusing me of “disrespecting” that disgusting, inept, narcissistic nigger jackanapes Obama, sitting on his goddamned brain in the White House.

Disrespect? 

Are you fucking kidding me – respect is EARNED, and Obama has not earned mine. Hell, I’d call that banana-lipped mulatto jungle bunny to his goddamned face if I ever encountered him, on national television, mind you. I have more respect for blood-bloated bedbugs than I ever could for a clown like Barack Obama – or his retarded predecessor, empty-eyed honky George W. Bush. Both are excrement under my feet, unworthy of respect or acknowledgement given to mangy felines. 

H. L. Mencken said it best: “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” 

Empty-eyes and the jackanapes are absolute PROOF of that assertion.

Further, according to the First Amendment, whether it is a lie or not, I am allowed to disrespect anyone that I want to, but that’s another story. Refer to the preceding post for verification of that assertion. 

Exploring another scenario, our esteemed betters may even employ a jackbooted gestapo pig to simply pull me over in the name of the law on a dark country road while driving my old, rusty junker home from the local convenience store – for the felonious crime of a bad tag light, and then dutifully blow my brains out all over the well-worn and split Naugahyde front bench seat. Afterward, the duly sworn servant of the people will plant an old, rusty rim-fire .32 on my cooling cadaver, in the name of freedom, god, George Washington, and Civil Rights. The following morning, Goebbelsian headlines will shrilly state that I was a terrorist, or a drug dealer, or a child molester, or that I didn’t love Jesus, or whatever it will take to paint kindly old Conway as as the most despicable fucking creature to have ever lived since Gaius Caligula, Emperor of the Romans. I won’t give a shit what they will say, as I’ll no longer exist, except as a rotting carcass of deanimated meat sitting in a local morgue.
 
I have yet to see one comment refuting my position that the First Amendment is a lie, though an anonymous commenter stated that they envied my vocabulary, and that Zip Code 12345 was based in Schenectady, New York at the General Electric home office. GE is a company founded by Thomas Edison, another atheist who invented a whole shitload of devices, like light bulbs, DC power distribution, phonographs, and the Kinetograph, an early motion picture camera. I found the Zip Code information to be an interesting piece of trivia, and thanked him or her for their input. The picture at the top of this essay is a nod to the anonymous poster.
 
That said, this vicious polemical essay will be devoted to exposing the Second Amendment for the LIE that it is, using American history and current events to SHOW the reader that it as nothing but mendacious sophistry used to dupe credulous, mentally-challenged drones, masquerading as the American citizenry.
 
Reiterating history, Mr. James Madison, hypocrite, wealthy, slave owning elitist, and Fourth President of the United States was the brilliant author of the ridiculous document called the “Bill of Rights”, which contain the First through Tenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of AmericaIt is my intention to prove conclusively at the end of each essay that all of them are lies, cunningly crafted as a smokescreen to mesmerize feckless idiots, seducing the credulous into believing that they have “inalienable rights” given to them by some sort of god. Considering there is no proof that god exists, it is safe to assume that god does not exist and never did exist. Expounding the preceding statement, it is evident that our “rights” come from the clever, talking APE called man, and are easily negated by the clever, talking APE called man, by using FORCE, either covertly, through legislation, or overtly, by employing physical persuasion. Oh well, so much for god and rights of man, I guess. Cynically summarizing, is plainly obvious that the American citizenry possessing firearms is a grave threat and very present danger to the evolving Federal and State fascist tyrannies. Therefore, the Second Amendment must, and will be negated by those in power to enable the tyranny to progress further

For example, while perusing the Internet, I have noticed that a group of evident government paid shills are plainly stating that everyone should give up their guns, due to the Federal Government possessing tanks and other superior weapons, with which they will subjugate the people by force. Psychologically, such remarks are tactical; they are a threat, and are being employed by those in power in order to intimidate and demoralize an already alienated population into feeling hopeless. Such clumsy tactics won’t work, and have been tried before, across history. What individuals with such ignorant worldviews do not realize is that governments exist at the WHIM of the CITIZENRY, not vice versa. People with nothing left to lose and everything to gain are not cowered by the threats of those individuals they consider intractable enemies – a cornered rat will fight a fucking lion, even with no hope of survival, and a million rats will defeat and devour one. That is the key; one determined citizen can be defeated easily, a thousand determined citizens, not so easily; with a million determined citizens – success and “regime change” of whatever type is virtually certain. 

Citing our blood-drenched history as proof, the ultimate goal of the cunning, talking APE called man is for a select group of greedy apes to gain POWER and control over the masses, using any means, so the masses can be exploited by those in power – to facilitate the pursuance of whatever perceived want or need that is desired by the controlling group, which has always been wealth, in varying forms – be it goats, gold, silver, slaves, ships, whores, wildebeests, or whatever is considered “valuable” at the time. Those in power can and will use anything to justify their lofty and exalted positions – invoking their perceived intelligence, the need for public safety; “science”, as it is so-called today, e.g., global warming and its ugly sister, climate change, or by even invoking god – when they are truly desperate and have no recourse, other than death. All of the above, contrived measures are very effective at duping dronelike clods, for the most part, until the shit hits the fan, then, all bets are off. Regardless of temporary success, given enough time, coupled with oppression of the masses, the masses revolt, a vicious bloodbath ensues and the victors establish a new government, which immediately sets out to accomplish the very same task that the vanquished regime pursued – to have power over and to control the masses, and to exploit them economically, for the exact same reasons.

Yes, the above could be considered a “Marxist” worldview – sue me.Anyway, the supposed worldviews of those gangsters presently running any nation doesn’t matter at all, whether they be capitalists, fascists, or communists, as long as the dronelike masses have something to believe in, like the easily convinced, dogmatic, gullible fools that they are. Autocratic statism and devotion to such is replacing religion; Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Mao’s Communist China, and the current United States of America are proof of that assertion. The only discernible differences in the above four entities is that the United States is promoting “friendly” fascism – wanton tyranny disguised as freedom, complete with a with a cynical motherfucking “happy face” plastered over wanton autocracy. Other than that there is no difference in execution of goals – subjugating and forcing the populace to adopt a particular worldview, to facilitate the agenda of the elitist vermin controlling and exploiting the masses. Then, when the masses being exploited finally wake up – things change – FAST, like an unstoppable wildfire. 

That’s all it takes, dear reader; the communist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks proved that nearly a century ago; just ask that exiled Trudovik Aleksandr Kerensky - after the Czar was deposed, he offered continuing war for the people, Lenin offered peace for a weary population. The battleship Aurora backed Lenin up, using her GUNS in the October Revolution. Yet another communist, Chairman Mao, said it quite succinctly: “All political power grows out of the barrel of a GUN”, and the worried, tyrannical, fascist despots running the United States today will resort to any kind of subterfuge to disarm and subjugate the citizenry, out of their very REAL fear of becoming the next Louis XVI, Czar Nicholas, or Nicolae Ceausescu. The amoral gangsters running this joint don’t want you to know these things – they make hundreds of thousands of dollars per annum running this moribund nation, while they LAUGH atYOU – how much do you make, and then PAY to them for your REAL labors, in TAXES, so they can live like KINGS over YOU?

Capitalism, communismhave you actually NOTICED – what difference is there? Vladimir Putin is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof ZIL limousines, while Barack Obama is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof Cadillac limousines – and YOU, a supposed “free citizen of the United States” drive around in some fucking old, common rusty junker Chevy or Nissan with 100,000 miles on it, wondering if the goddamned oil pump or alternator is going to take a shit and cost you a pile of money that you do not have. Hey, credit cards work, and you’d better make sure your insurance and tags are current too, or the pigs will collar you as a “criminal” and cost you even more bucks. Politicians and their ilk live in palatial mansions staffed by servants, you live in a mortgaged dump, at best, owned by a bank, or you rent an apartment owned by those like them; they have the best of everything, and pretty capped teeth, too – you have yellow dentures or rotten teeth at best. Funny thing is – YOU paid for their palatial mansions and their capped teeth, with YOUR taxes, that they BILKED from YOU, via their fellow gangsters at the IRS. If you don’t pay their “protection” in the form of TAXES – they steal what you own and then put you in prison so you can get fucked in your ass, in the name of, justice,  Jesus or whatever – what real difference is there between they and the MAFIA? They LAUGH at YOU, and me, like the parasitical vermin they are – but they are morbidly AFRAID, as the populace has GUNS. They must take them away, at any cost, including your death.

 
One of my very favorite movies is “Nicholas and Alexandra”, from 1971 – especially the end, where the entire pampered “Royal Family” is mercilessly slaughtered by the vengeful Bolsheviks – along with the wonderful YouTube videos of Ceausescu and his cunt wife Elena being shot to death on Christmas Day, 1989. I actually laughed at them; I never had a better “Christmas present”, ever – seeing that despotic asshole and his wife coldly knocked off with Kalashnikovs as one would dispatch a rabid dog. Call me sadistic if you like, but I truly enjoy seeing elitists like Louis XVI, Nicholas Romanov or that bastard Ceausescu get exactly what they deserve; I make no apologies for it and I never will. If I live long enough I plan to enjoy watching videos depicting such wonderful occurrences in the good old USA, playing over YouTube for my viewing pleasure, while smiling at the carnage like a vindictive demon.

Enough lengthy diatribe for now – in continuation of this series over the arbitrary date of 2014, CE, I shall also prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that most other amendments adopted after the Fourteenth Amendment were passed to ERODE and DESTROY freedom, with other selected amendments being either patently obtuse, e.g., Amendment XVIII, or put forth in a cynical attempt to thwart revolt, e,g,. Amendment XXVI, adopted during the Vietnam war.Below, the text of the Second Amendment, verbatim:

THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Analysis of the Second Amendment:

Quite plainly, the citizens of the United States ARE the militia, and those citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to keep weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) within their homes and on their persons, and citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to bear weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) if necessary, i.e., USE (e.g., clubs, knives, swords crossbows, ball bats and specifically firearms) for target practice, huntingself-defense and even to defend themselves from governmental tyranny. Further, according to the Second Amendment, Congress MAY NOT promulgate laws that limit or “infringe” the exercise of a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms, period. For the remainder of this essay, I shall only specifically refer to firearms, as they are the very core of the Second Amendment.

At least that’s what the Second Amendment SAYS, but it is, after all, only sophistry written on a page of parchment, it cannot enforce itself, unlike those well-protected, well-armed individuals who make up a government, who can, will and do enforce their will, for good or ill, upon the hapless citizenry. 

The Founding Fathers and others agree with the above interpretation of the Second Amendment, complete, verbatim citations would take up a lot of my time and needless space, so I shall post convenient links for the reader’s perusal:

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Washington

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/james_madison.html

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/thomas_jefferson.html

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_29.html


http://www.madisonbrigade.com/j_adams.htm

http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/63859.James_Madison

http://www.mgoa.com/GunRightsQuotes-1.htm

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/gun-quotations-founding-fathers

http://www.godseesyou.com/2nd_amendment_quotes.html

http://www.eskimo.com/~bpentium/articles/guns.html

http://www.beararms.us/FamousQuotes.php

http://www.quotations.com/gun_control.htm

I submit the above links are enough to prove the intention of the Founding Fathers with regard to individual citizens possessing firearms for personal usefor hunting, for self-defense, and for prevention of governmental tyranny. Some may not believe my assertion, and may choose to split hairs, arrogantly stating that some of the sites are “biased” or “fringe” sites – who the fuck cares – the quotations of the Founding Fathers are their very words, they are accurate, and can be found elsewhere on the Internet - simply look their quotes up yourself on other sites if you doubt my veracity.

Now, using all of the above as a premise, I shall show the reader that the Second Amendment is a LIE. I will accomplish this task using several dialectical steps, as follows:

1) Rights of any type are not inherent, nor do they come from a god, they are given to the citizens by the governing body, and can be easily modified, or even taken away by the governing body if deemed necessary or expedient, by using “laws”, or force.

Expounding on that premise, and illustrating the unabashed hypocrisy of the Founders of this nation; at the time of the Founding Fathers, niggers had no rights at all; they weren’t citizens of anywhere and they were even viewed as animals, by said hypocrites. Then, after the Civil War, they were given rights by those in power who won the war. You see, it wasn’t any god that endowed niggers with rights, nor did their rights magically appear from the ethers – they were GIVEN their rights by other PEOPLE, specifically, Northern whiteys, on a whim, to arrogantly rub the defeated Southerner’s noses in it, so to speak.

Was it “right” or “good” to do any of the above? Who the fuck knows – morality and ethics are completely arbitrarydependent on the given situation – might makes right, and that’s all that counts, or ever did count, in reality, regardless of any rhetorical sophistry stating otherwise.

2) Rights of any type are not “inalienable”, considering that martial law “suspends” our supposed “god given rights” – just ask folks like Abraham Lincoln, and the Territorial Governor of Hawaii, Joseph Poindexter. “Rights” vanished like a fart in the wind – with the proclamations of MEN, that is, Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Poindexter.

3) Several US states and localities during the 1800’s attempted to interfere with gun ownership and the use thereof, promulgating “concealed weapons” laws, but most of those laws were simply a nuisance. However, the fact that they succeeded in passing such legislation exemplifies the Second Amendment for what it IS –  just another cunning lie for credulous drones to believe in. Such legalistic legerdemain was only the beginning of the “slippery slope” that is leading to outright CONFISCATION of legally owned firearms in Connecticut – a state supposedly governed by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Connecticut

http://benswann.com/connecticut-sends-letter-to-unregistered-gun-owners-to-surrender-firearms/

So much for your risible, non-existent “right” to “keep and bear” arms, citizen, or more aptly, subject – I maintain that the Second Amendment IS a fucking LIE.

4) With the Federal Government usurping more power originally delegated to the People or the States (the Ninth and Tenth Amendments) in the Twentieth Century, the Congress of the United States of America has, since 1934, blatantly infringed on the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms, starting with the “National Firearms Act”, signed into law by the cripple, in both body and mind, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The “Gun Control Act” of 1968 followed, signed into law by the crooked, amoral megalomaniac Lyndon Baines Johnson, with the “Brady Handgun Violence Act” of 1993, and the “Federal Assault Weapons Ban” of 1994, signed into law by the mendacious whoremonger, William Jefferson Clinton. 

Links to each “ACT” are provided below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

Although I despise both Democrats and Republicans equally, as both are little more than elected gangsters, it is rather odd that all of the above laws were promoted, passed and promulgated by DEMOCRATS, the vociferous, self-proclaimed “defenders of the Constitution”. Oh well, hypocrisy and mendaciousness are nothing new - just look at the corrupt Roman Senate at the time of Cicero or the utterly disgusting Greek “Democratic” Senate that condemned Socrates to DEATH. Incidentally, the same goes for the major wars of the Twentieth Century, i.e., World Wars One and Two; they were prosecuted by DEMOCRATS, together with their presiding over lesser wars like Korea and Vietnam, but that’s another story altogether. Yes, the current conflicts we are in, e.g., Afghanistan, or have recently exited from, i.e., Iraq, are the products of Republican Administrations, both prosecuted with the overwhelming support of Democrats, mind you; that only proves there is no difference at all between the Democrat or Republican parties of today.

5) Another convenient link, illustrating the concept of the “slippery slope” is now presented for the reader to peruse, further showing before all who read that the Second Amendment is a LIE.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States

6) Current Goebbelsian propaganda, created by cunning authors to dupe the young into a contrived interpretation of the Second Amendment, supported by the United States Federal Government, as is illustrated by the links below:

http://truthstreammedia.com/ap-history-textbook-that-altered-2nd-amendment-also-lied-about-4th/

http://www.dailypaul.com/299365/high-school-ap-history-book-rewrites-the-2nd-amendment

http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/09/19/high-school-textbook-rewriting-the-second-amendment-distributed-to-hundreds-of-schools-nationwide/

https://www.google.com/search?q=altered+second+amendment+textbook&oq=altered+second+amendment+textbook&aqs=chrome..69i57.12499j0j8&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8

Here is an op-ed, from the New York Times, supporting the Goebbelsian rewrite of the Second Amendment:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/opinion/rewrite-the-second-amendment.html?_r=0

Lastly, here, for the reader, is an article of blatant, biased, contrived Goebbelsian LIES about the Second Amendment, with opposing comments destroying the author, Thom Hartmann’s, stance:

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts

Analysis completed, I submit, by citing and comparing the above theses, derived  from eight disparate premises, and with only the written words of the Second Amendment as an opposing antithesis, that a credible synthesis can be quickly deduced, with minimal effort:

The Second Amendment is CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN as the goddamned LIE that it is.

I again invite anyone, I even dare you, from drooling drone to Constitutional Scholar, to PROVE my terse assertion wrong, by using FACTS, backed up with supporting evidence in the form of accredited, or at least provable, citations. The onus is upon you to prove me wrong, and, if such is proven, I shall publicly concede defeat at your hands, and post notations of such defeat in a later essay.

Just wait until I prove the idiotic Third Amendment as a goddamned, motherfucking LIE – that’s coming up next. I will succeed in doing that by employing the same legalistic cunning and legerdemain that lawyers use in “proving” that “money can commit a crime”, or that “corporations are persons”, which the former cannot and the latter is not, in any universe that is populated by those considered SANE. Both are logical fallacies and absurd contrivances that would be laughed at by those like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, but what the hell – man is the measure of all things, including definition – just ask Protagoras, or that old, silly kike Noam Chomsky.

Regards,

Conway

A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part One

February 26, 2014

Hello again.

This post is a departure from my usual rants, the first in a series of polemical essays, coupled with analysis, which will prove that Americans have no inalienable rights, given by god or man, and never did. Our supposed “rights” are only privileges at best, which can be taken away at the leisure of those fraudulently elected criminals who control this decadent, moribund society.

Premise noted, I’m a mean, vicious, atheistic old man, and I’ve grown tired of pissing into the wind, posting jaded current events commentary that no one reads, regarding idiotic, non-existent gods, meretricious politicians, crooked pigs, stupid whiteys, dumb niggers, dog-gobbling, slant-eyed gooks, mixed-up half-breeds like Jackanapes Obama, feckless cunts, obtuse pricks, and queers of either sex, together with other assorted worthless flotsam, passing as news.

So, rather than touting windmills like a modern day Don Quixote, in this post, I have elected to take on the most flagrant example of wanton mendaciousness to have ever appeared on this benighted globe: The Constitution of the United States of America, authored by a man called James Madison of the State of Virginia; specifically concentrating on its ugly sister, introduced by him, the attendant document dubbed the “Bill of Rights“. This long dead honky was a brilliant political theorist, the fourth president of the United States, and a wanton fucking hypocrite of the first degree – an aloof, wealthy elitist who owned a pack of shitskinned jungle bunnies who were charged with raising and harvesting tobacco for him and his family, so he and they could sit on their fat asses, drinking Mint Juleps and profiting from the unpaid labors of his nigger slaves. He rationalized all of the above by claiming to be a “Christian” or deist of sorts, plainly stating that African eight-balls were three-fifths of a human being. I must say, judging from their collective behavior today, I candidly wonder if most coons are human at all, but that’s another story.

All that aside – James Madison created one of the most brilliant compositions to have ever seen the light of day – The Constitution of the United States of America, together with his “Bill of Rights”. These documents were and are supposedly revered by American politicians and the drooling cadre of insensate drones who vote for such criminals, with the vast majority of the fools occupying this nation not even knowing what the contrived sophistry called the Constitution says, or is supposed to mean. No matter, this dying nation is getting exactly what it deserves; hopefully I will live to see it utterly destroyed by its enemies, so I can laugh like a jackal, while bluntly stating “I told you so”.

Looking at the soft-palmed gangsters charged with administering this bankrupt farce of a country, I utterly despise hypocrisy and arrogance, much like a Biblical character who called himself Jesus Christ. He despised the elitists of his day, those frauds called Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes, moneylenders. together with other assorted vermin that infested Roman Judea, parasites living like vampires off the stupid populace. The parasitical vermin running this benighted entity today are no different than they were, and, if history is any precedent, those parasites of today will receive their just desserts, just like the Judeans received justice from the conquering Romans under General Titus, son of Emperor Vespasian – a better leader than the United States has ever produced, or ever will produce.

I shall concentrate on Madison’s silly “Bill of Rights”, and several other Amendments authorized after the first ten, and conclusively prove to all who read that they are nothing but lies – mendacious contrivances that should be exposed before the people as the worthless, rhetorical sophistry that they are. Each Amendment will be noted and addressed, after which blatant violations of said Amendment will be presented. Afterward, using Hegel’s dialectic, a thesis and antithesis will be created for the reader, and a synthesis deduced from the preceding, resulting in the Amendment being ripped apart by me – your friend Conway, employing cited EVIDENCE from history  – in an effort to PROVE the entire “Bill of Rights” and selected later Amendments are nothing but LIES used  to dupe credulous, unthinking idiots, and nothing more.

Listing and analysis follows, starting with the First Amendment, noted verbatim:

THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Analysis of the First Amendment:

The Congress is the Legislative Branch of the United States, and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution specifically prohibits the Establishment of a “State Religion” by Congress. 

According to the First Amendment, Congressional interference with the free exercise of ANY religious belief, or the LACK of religious belief, is prohibited, period. Quite simply, if one wants to worship Jesus, or Satan, or Mohammed, or even 1966 Ford Fairlanes with air conditioning, or stand in a public square and shout “Jesus is the Son of God” or “God does not exist“, or “Jesus sucks” or “God hates fags” or even “Mohammed was a murderous pedophile” – it is any citizen’s RIGHT to do so, and Congress cannot do one goddamned, motherfucking thing about any of the above.

Further, according to the First Amendment, the Congress of the United States of America CANNOT stop ANYONE from uttering their opinions or beliefs, no matter how “offensive” such beliefs or opinions may be deemed by politicians or the masses. Neither can Congress prohibit a newspaper or other media from printing or promoting such beliefs or opinions, however “offensive” such beliefs or opinions may be deemed by the politicians or the masses. Congress cannot prohibit the RIGHT of anyone to peacefully assemble to discuss and promote their views, no matter how “offensive” such views may be considered by politicians or the masses. In addition, Congress cannot prohibit the people from contacting THEIR government to address perceived “grievances” in the form of a hearing.

I shall now conclusively prove before all who read that the First Amendment is a LIE, employing minimal ribald expletives to do so. Racial epithets will be liberally used, in keeping with my utter contempt for the talking apes called humanity; if you don’t like that, tough, close the page and fuck off.

How will I prove conclusively that the First Amendment is a lie?

To begin, the historical evidence of wanton mendacity is myriad, starting in, at the very least, the early twentieth century, with other examples going back to 1798, CE, under yet another hypocritical president called John Adams, with his “alien and sedition acts”. Adams hated frogs and micks, because they weren’t Federalists, and he made no bones about it, you see. 

Concentrating on the twentieth century, we will first address the acts enacted under yet another mendacious, hypocritical president, a scoundrel called Woodrow Wilson; may he rot in his grave forever without respite. Incidentally, for those uneducated, simpering ignoramuses that view Wilson as a liberal icon, the man was a true, unabashed racist who despised niggers, viewing them as little more than troublesome shitskins that were barely human. He also lied though his teeth in order to be re-elected, and then immediately involved the United States in the debacle of World War One.

The First Amendment meant nothing to Wilson, in fact, he went out of his way to abridge the freedom of speech of the American people, using the “Sedition Act” of 1918″. This “law” was an extension of the “Espionage Act of 1917″, an earlier law passed to criminalize those who disagreed with this tyrannical megalomaniac’s subjective worldview. Look it up for yourself; I cannot and will not waste time and space reiterating the obvious and easily verifiable charges that I bring. Use Wikipedia to begin, and then consult other resources to verify Wikipedia if you like – I’ll even give you some links for starters, as follows, including hypocrite John Adam’s Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and an article on Wilson, a no-good sonofabitch, included for continuity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918


How’s that for “freedom”, American drone?

Moving on to the thirties, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was even worse than Woodrow Wilson, if such is possible. Under his watch, the House Committee on Un-American Activities” was created in 1938; “Un-American activities” being  a nebulous term at best, used by the Federal Government to crush dissent – at that time, in the form of those labeled by the authorities as “communists” or “fascists”.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee

That crippled piece of disgusting, chain-smoking vermin, FDR, also signed the Smith act of 1940, which was and is a complete antithesis to the First Amendment; he then proceeded to round up communists, fascists, Germans, Italians, Japanese and all others he deemed to be “enemies of the United States”. Stalinesque, isn’t it, to imprison and control the lives of others without due process of  law, according to the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Link to an explanation of the draconian “Smith Act” is provided below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act

One would expect such laws to be enacted in places like Nazi Germany, Stalin’s Soviet Union, Mao’s China or Kim Jong Un’s North Korea, but to be promulgated in the United States, the “bastion of freedom“? The Smith Act took decades to be proven as the enemy of freedom it was, via lawsuits, with various Supreme Court decisions during the late forties through the fifties nullifying its most draconian provisions, but not before hundreds of people had their lives destroyed by this gross violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech and the right of the people to peacefully assemble to discuss ideas  - regardless if such ideas are considered “offensive” by those criminals in power, or by the majority of drooling, mesmerized drones who worship them.

A malignant outgrowth of this tyrannical legislation were the witch hunts of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, a wanton drunk who gleefully proceeded to turn the lives of many Americans into a living hell, due to being accused by McCarthy, et al, of being “communists”, whatever they actually are, considering that Marxism is a rather eclectic worldview. Simply compare Karl Marx’s worldview to that of Vladimir Lenin, and then Lenin to Leon Trotsky, and then all of the former to the likes of Joseph Stalin and Chairman Mao. That noted, apparently Mr. McCarthy never bothered to read the text of the First Amendment, or perhaps he was incapable of understanding it, due to alcoholic dementia – you see, according to Amendment One of the Constitution of the United States of America  – The First Amendment –  people have the absolute RIGHT to be communists if they so choose

Further, according to the First Amendment, the people, as free citizens of the United States, have the absolute RIGHT to be communists, anarchistsfascists, or nazis, or racists of any type, be they nigger, gook or honky and all in between. Whiteys can be cross-burning Klansmen, and niggers can be honky despising Black Panthers, and anyone can be an atheist, or a theist, or even a pantheistad infinitum. Further, according to the First Amendment – people have the RIGHT to HATE other people if they so desire, for ANY reason they may choose, or to LOVE them if they wish, and they also have the RIGHT to exclude or include those they deem unsuitable or suitable to associate with, period. 

In other words – anyone has the RIGHT to discriminate, i.e., to be “bigoted” or “prejudicial” in their worldview. Whether those who practice such beliefs are “right” or “wrong” is not the issue here, as morality and ethics are relative; the First Amendment, as written, guarantees that any citizen can entertain and promote ANY of the above ideas, period, and Congress is absolutely forbidden to interfere with those promoting such ideas.

That is what “freedom” IS, reader – if you don’t like it – move to North Korea and worship your one true god – lick the boots of Kim Jong Un, a pampered, despotic, soft-palmed punk who doesn’t know his fat gook ass from a hole in the ground.

Even individual states got into the act of abridging freedom of speech, a glaring example being the State of Alabama in 1956, which attempted to twist a provision of their dubious law regarding “registration of foreign corporations” in their state to prevent NAACP niggers from operating in Alabama. In 1957, the Supreme Court became involved, deciding in the favor of NAACP, specifically recognizing the right of “Freedom of Association“, implied, but not specifically noted in the First Amendment. Honestly, to any critically thinking individual, “freedom of association” is quite obvious and not implied when looking at the phrase of: “the right of the people peaceably to assemble. Why it had to be decided by the Supreme Court strains credulity, though I am quite pleased that they decided in the favor of the NAACP in a rare case of justice actually being done. Really, what part of the phrase “the right of the people peaceably to assemble” did not the idiots running Alabama understand? I wager the the criminal whiteys running Alabama at the time considered the plaintiffs “niggers” and nothing more, and as niggers, the had “no standing”, to use a phrase so commonly employed by the the criminals running the nation today, especially when it comes to the narcissistic, megalomaniacal jackanapes sitting in the White House.

See link below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Colored_People_v._Alabama

You see, according to the First Amendment, niggers have the RIGHT to assemble peaceably to further their agenda and promote their worldviews; so do honkies, spics, kikes, queers, theists, atheists, loony UFO believers, polygamists, animal rights goofballs, bestiality aficionados, and so forth.

Examples of groups “peaceably”, for the most part, promoting their agendas are as follows:

http://www.naacp.org/

http://www.blackpanther.org/


http://www.kkk.com/


http://www.natallnews.com/


http://www.nclr.org/

http://www.bnaibrith.org/


http://www.glaad.org/


http://www.christianrights.org/

http://www.cair.com/

http://www.atheists.org/


http://ufo-news-club.ning.com/


http://www.sisterwives.net/


http://www.peta.org/


http://www.zeta-verein.de/en/


Yes – the bestiality site is based in Germany – I have always thought that krauts are fucked up people, considering their bizarre history, coupled with the above site. They are the same folks who brought you Kaiser Wilhelm, Sigmund Freud, V2s, Volkswagens, BMWs, and Adolf Hitler, deceased fuehrer of the “Thousand Year Reich”. Yes, two of the men in the preceding sentence were considered Austrian nationals, as if there is much of a difference between Austrians and Germans, or bohunks, or even frogs or block-headed polocks for that matter.

Most if not all other sites are American, not that I even bothered to look up the WHOIS on any of the above collection of deranged weirdos, as I don’t really fucking care who they are, and I never want to know any of them, on any level. All are equally crazy bastards in my book, and they can all go fuck themselves. It’s bad enough that this nation is so fucking Balkanized that it is literally on the verge of civil war – I wager the clowns occupying the top of the list truly enjoy pouring gasoline on a raging bonfire.

Tangentially, I never have understood the concept of “racial or ethnic pride” of any kind, let alone the utterly ridiculous term of “sexual pride”, promoted mostly by queers of all varieties, with their silly LGBT “rallies”. Queerdom will never be considered normative in any universe – get over it, and stop trying to force your minority worldview down other’s throats – if you keep it up – it may get you dead, courtesy of a pack of other angry apes who view your lifestyles as “anathema” to their worldviews. I am warning you as a disinterested, aloof, atheistic observer – I don’t care and I never have cared, nor will I ever care if you are gay – but many others do care, religious and irreligious – and they will kill you if you keep trying to promote your unusual proclivities as “normal” with regard to the vast majority of talking apes infesting this tiny, insignificant planet called Earth, orbiting a small star in an average galaxy called the Milky Way, floating about in the middle of nowhere.

Sexual pride – what the fuck is that, anyway – being “proud” of having a dick, or a cunt? Having “pride” in whether you jam your stiff cock up someone’s ass, or their twat? Pride in face-sitting or sixty-nining, like salivating beasts in the throes of heat – now that’s something to be proud of, right? Really, how can anyone be “proud” of being a muff-diver, or a cocksucker, either homosexual or heterosexual? Yeah – people fuck in various ways –  it is a fact of existence – who cares, and how can anyone be “proud” of such actions? Really, how in hell can anyone be “proud” of something they had no choice in being? I candidly submit that those individuals who identify and define theirselves by race, gender or sexuality are very shallow persons indeed, and should look beyond such inane trivialities, even though they never will, due to being incapable of doing so, as they are fixated in a Freudian sense, and downright obtuse.

I can easily see the idea of being proud that one has a Ph.D in medicine, physics or chemistry, or having pride in the ability to compose music, or art, or being good at basketball or bricklaying, but having pride in one’s racial background, ethnicity or sexuality is inane, for lack of a better word.

Moving on, religious or irreligious “pride” is almost just as bad as the preceding absurdities, but at least those clowns have made a conscious choice in the matter, unlike cretins who were born of whatever color, gender, or sexual preference – there isn’t any choice in that, people, wake up and admit it. Further, nationalism, or “pride in one’s country” strikes me as illogical, not to mention jingoistic; you don’t really have much choice as to where you are born; therefore, I, Conway, consider myself as a citizen of the world, presently living in Jerkwater, USA, 12345.

My latest diatribe finished – back to the First Amendment. Using the evidence presented above, it is time to cogitate as to whether Americans have “inalienable rights”, or is the First Amendment, in actual reality, nothing but contrived sophistry, promulgated for credulous drones?

Thesis: According to the First Amendment, Americans have the right to free speech, the right to freedom of religious or anti-religious propaganda, the right to utter their opinions for good or ill, the right to peacefully assemble to discuss and promote dissenting opinions, they have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and they have the right to associate with whom they please.

Antithesis: Historical precedent plainly shows that the Federal and State governments of the United States of America can easily abridge or completely negate freedom of speech, or even freedom of religion, assembly, and association, via “laws”, or even decrees, as with “martial law”. Based on the evidence presented, all one needs to do is to review the laws passed in the twentieth century for proof of the assertion that the people truly have no rights, only privileges which can be rescinded on a whim by the governing body. Further, legal items from the 21st Century, specifically the “Patriot Act”, signed into law by that simpering, empty-eyed motherfucker, George W. Bush, limit all of the above, together with violating other Amendments in and even beyond the Bill of Rights, which will be addressed in later essays, should I live long enough to do so.

Synthesis: The First Amendment, regardless of all of the flowery rhetoric, is a goddamned LIE.

I now invite any and all who read this vitriolic screed to rebut me – prove my synthesis wrong, by using facts, coupled with appropriate citations supporting your position. 

I arrogantly dare you, and I candidly submit that no man or woman on this entire planet can prove me wrong in my assertion that the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is a bald-faced LIE, written for credulous fools. Go ahead, prove me wrong, using FACTS, and I shall publicly concede defeat, here, on my blog, before all who read and have read these polemical essays. 

I will not bother to hold my breath waiting for anyone, from a drooling, jingoistic American cretin to an accredited Constitutional Scholar, to disprove my blunt contention and assertion that the First Amendment is nothing but a goddamned, motherfucking LIE – I am that confident of my stance. Don’t try pretzel logic either, stating that the fact that I have posted such a diatribe proves that “freedom of speech” is true and inviolable. I carefully choose my words; I advocate nothing, other than my personal RIGHT to freedom of speech – which I have TAKEN, using the law of the jungle.

Emotional appeals based on delusional or nebulous reasoning, i.e., “because my powerful god says it is so”, “you’re a mean person”, or other such fallacious lunacy or ad hominem attacks will be considered inappropriate, but such remarks will be posted in the comments section, verbatim, and then ridiculed and exposed for the rhetorical sophistry that they are. 

You’re angry now – just wait until I come back, attack and effortlessly DESTROY every other laughable Amendment of the United States Constitution, that credulous American idiots believe in, like some sort of ersatz god.

Regards,

Conway

Conway’s Holiday Update

January 1, 2014

Conway here – Merry fucking Christmas, and Happy New Year. If you don’t like me wishing you a merry fucking Christmas, fuck off.

I’ve finally gotten back into the spirit of creating new articles, after a long hiatus; trading stocks and tending to other things in life take precedent over something as silly as composing cathartic diatribes that no one reads.

That horseshit out of the way, a review of the major stories of the past year is in order, launching my latest vitriolic attack on the arrogant, aloof, elitist, apelike creatures charged with administering this dying nation. Let’s see – jackanapes Obama was re-elected, as I predicted, George Zimmerman was acquitted, as I predicted, and the United States has sunk even further into abject insanity, as I predicted. Kermit Gosnell was convicted by a jury of his peers – which – curiously enough, I did not predict; it surprised the living hell out of me that the murderous moolie was convicted, but, considering the evidence, anything other than a conviction was impossible. The cowardly, greedy, arrogant jig agreed to accept a term of “life in prison”, rather than a death sentence, which he deserves – hopefully he will receive justice at the hands of musclebound jailhouse queers who have an attraction to old, freckle-faced niggers.

The only good thing that happened in 2013 are the revelations made by Edward Snowden, the NSA contractor who decided to expose the United States for what it actually is, before the entire world: an arrogant, moribund, two-faced, hypocritical, bankrupt, decadent, totalitarian Orwellian police state run by gangsters – disguised as a “republic”, and dubbed a “democracy” by politicians, brain-dead drones, and the government controlled media. I just love being told by those cocksuckers as to how fucking free I am – I have the freedom to suck dicks and fuck other men in their asses, and slaughter unborn children by the truckload, and I have the freedom to be as fucking obnoxious as I want  to be – but only if I am a queer, or support the wholesale killing of of unwanted brats by some horny cunt who couldn’t use birth control or keep her fucking legs closed. Strange that I am not free to dissent from supporting the above, or to associate with whom I please, or to support others who are allied with my subjective worldview.

I have been told that on various threads I bothered to respond to, posting my disagreement with the herd, sans the colorful language that I use here. When commenting on threads related to articles that I read, I do not use foul language nor racial epithets, nor do I employ ad-hominems; however, I have been banned by such sites as Politico and Topix, along with the Huffington Post, LA Times and CBS, for daring to disagree. I submit for all who read this diatribe: the Soviet Union was freer than this goddamned insane asylum could ever be.

I humbly present this short diatribe as a prelude to further vicious polemical essays that will be posted in 2014.

Regards,

Conway

A Future YOU Asked For

December 23, 2013

I had originally intended to post this screed in the summer of 2013, but sheer boredom with the tedium of blogging has prevented it until now – I only am posting it for continuity, and in preparation for future polemical essays.

Greetings fellow talking apes, your friend Conway has finally returned after a long hiatus, having composed more jarring, foul mouthed, politically incorrect vitriol that the reader loves, or perhaps hates with an unbridled passion. Either way, I don’t give a shit what anyone thinks of what I write; you are reading what I think, for good or ill. What anyone else thinks is not very important to me, if at all important – what I THINK is important, and fuck everyone else. Really, I must draw a line somewhere; those individuals who do not appreciate my scrawlings may close the fucking page and move to something more in accordance with their tastes; I won’t care.

Unlike most other blogs, which are unfortunately a microcosm of this moribund society at large, the reader is allowed to disagree with me, and to tell me so by responding to my vicious polemical essays, though at the risk of me pointing out fallacies in the disagreement, or if the reader simply wishes to call me a motherfucker, they risk me calling them a motherfucker, right back.
In disgust I deleted the essay I had intended to post in October 2012 as the elections went exactly as I predicted they would go, without any endorsements from me, mind you. I cannot endorse criminals; I view all of our leaders as meretricious scoundrels, regardless of party, and I refuse to vote for those I consider my enemies, and enemies of the people of the United States. In the months having passed since then, we have witnessed jackanapes Obama’s glorious re-election by a society of brain-dead drones, with a little help from the dead electorate too – voting in rigged elections across the country. Now that the inept eight-ball has been re-elected, it seems he has gone into overdrive in his determined frenzy to destroy what is left of this nation, employing draconian assaults on the constitutional rights of the American citizenry.

Where to start regarding the Head Gangster’s scandals and crimes – well, we have Benghazi, we have the AP wiretapping incident, we have the Holder/Rosen affair and we have the IRS singling out conservative groups, to name a few, not to mention Fast and Furious, together with another dozen or so criminal fuck-ups that occurred before this aloof, obtuse, obnoxious nigger was re-elected in an election that gives new meaning to the word FRAUD. As a side, we also have a young man named Edward Snowden, a government contractor who has proven that the Federal Government and its alphabet soup subsidiaries like the NSA and CIA are little more than a coterie of paranoid, obsessive-compulsive gangsters that have no regard at all for the privacy or rights of US citizens.

For Benghazi alone the smoothtalking moolie should be collared, impeached, convicted and thrown out of office, and afterward prosecuted as a war criminal and jailed for the rest of his life. It seems that condescending bastard can get away with ANYTHING - what hold does this half-breed with no history have over his fellow crooks and the American citizenry?

What the hell has happened to this nation? The American people have always been ignorant, unsophisticated fools for the most part, but the paralyzing apathy that has permeated this dump rivals that of the Roman Empire in the fifth century. For decades the young have received “educations” that have left them even more ignorant  than when they first entered school; some of these “graduates” cannot even find the fucking United States on a goddamn map of the planet. They have been specially conditioned by those in power to be ignorant, parroting drones, inculcated to believe anything they are told by the government and its mouthpiece, the media. They have been brainwashed into believing, with a religious fervor, that they have “rights” that were never even remotely touched upon in the Constitution, and are further mesmerized into disdaining the rights that they were guaranteed to possess by the Bill of Rights.

An insidious cabal of power-mad criminals have facilitated this vexing phenomenon; going back at least as far as the early 20th Century, that set out in a deliberate fashion to destroy the very fabric of Western culture. I submit they have succeeded, considering what this nation has become: a vicious, angry herd of left or right leaning, self-absorbed, alienated, self-convinced, dogmatic maniacs – hell bent on destroying each other at any cost.

I, for one, sincerely hope that they do destroy themselves, to the last man, and hope that I live to enjoy and relish in the destruction of this blossoming evil empire.

That said, The United States of America, for having turned its collective back on the Constitution, now deserves anything and everything it gets – from anyone.

Regards,

Conway

PLEASE STAND BY…

September 15, 2012

Thanks to the urging of several readers of my vicious polemical essays, I shall return shortly, meaner than ever.

Once again the reader will be inundated with jaded, foul-mouthed, epithet-strewn observations, regarding jackanapes Obama, Smiling Cobra Romney, meretricious politiciansshitkicking Moslems, and crooked pigs, along with posts illustrating other thoroughly nauseating examples of the clueless, superstitious, arrogant, bipedal shit factories who laughingly refer to themselves as homo-sapiens.

Regards,

Conway

Moolie Martin/Zooter Zimmerman Redux

April 16, 2012

Note the photo – “Little Trayvon” doesn’t look so fucking innocent now, does he?


POWERED BY HATE
Yes, Conway’s blog is now powered by hate, an efficient fuel much better than simple matter-antimatter could ever be – an unparalleled bastion of total political incorrectness, erupting like an exploding volcano from the flaming bowels of hell. My vicious polemical essays are propelled by an unabashed, white-hot hatred of collective humanity’s unbridled stupidity; their hypocrisytheir arrogancetheir religionstheir pseudo-science, and the utterly idiotic idea of all men being “brothers“, along with the inane concept of being “created equal“.
With all due apologies to Jefferson and Locke, I submit history has proven that such assertions are untenable, if not completely ridiculous to any critically thinking mind.
Brothers? Brothers my ass, tell me, how in hell can a delusional, slant-eyed Buddhist chink, sitting on a mountaintop in China meditating, possibly be the “brother” of a swarthy, hate-filled, shitkicker Allah worshiping raghead in Saudi Arabia, a loony fundie Christian snake handler from the Ozarks, or a vicious, nihilistic atheist like me? I candidly wager that the brotherhood of man is a bunch of shit, believed in by individuals who refuse to see facts, period. The only quality that any of the above individuals have in common, including myself, is that they are mostly hairless, talking apes, prone from birth to be dogmatic, intransigent creatures, who in reality know little or nothing about the true nature of the universe.
Created equal? Really, then kindly tell me how a drooling mongoloid idiot, a trisomic aberration that is at least ambulatory, is equal to a theoretical physicist like say, Stephen Hawking, who is a wheelchair bound, paralyzed genius. If you see any form of equality in the preceding example, you’re fucking crazier than I am. That said, the only “qualities” a mongoloid idiot and Hawking possibly share, if one can use that nomenclature to describe such dreadful existences, is that they have both been given the shit end of the stick by mother nature.
Expounding on the premise of “creation” – created by what I ask, and for whom? Perhaps a capricious, malevolent demon with nothing better to do? Why, and for what reason? Perhaps to entertain that lonely, capricious, malevolent demon with nothing better to do? Utterly ridiculous, and completely unworthy of further thought – a universe created by a gregarious monster with needs, masquerading as a god?
God, if such a creature exists, which I firmly believe does not exist – cannot have needs and cannot be an asshole, like man does and IS; if it exists and it possesses such dubious “qualities”, it is not a god by any measure of the word. Face it folks, regarding religion – it’s all unsubstantiated, ontological BULLSHIT promulgated by cunning men to keep credulous, unthinking drones in line. Wake up from your addled torpor and smell what is being shoveled; it certainly isn’t hay, and it smells like a pig’s pungent sphincter on a hot summer day.
Dispensing with “god”, considering that such a creature as man envisions cannot possibly exist anywhere – if evolution is truly correct, which I personally think it is – how the fuck can anyone on this goddamned tiny planet be equal to any other human being, excepting for in a legal sense, which I totally agree with, mind you. Too bad soft-palmed, elitist pigs like Barack Obama or Mitt Romney don’t agree with such a premise, as they and their ilk are so much better than the rest of us. Oh yes, both of these posturing scoundrels claim to believe in “god” too, which, judging from their actions, make them prime examples of the biggest fucking hypocrites who ever lived. Does anyone reading see the glaring mutual exclusivities contained in the absurd conjectures called brotherhood, created equality and religion, put forth in the preceding paragraphs? If not, forget it, and read on if you like; otherwise, close the page and fuck off; what’s coming next is even uglier than what you just read.
Thesis, antithesis, and synthesis regarding man’s myriad delusions out of the way, hello again, your good friend Conway is here, having created yet another hateful, vitriolic missive guaranteed to piss off most everyone, excepting perhaps for Floridian proto-thug Trayvon Martin, who has unwillingly joined the ranks of those individuals labeled as “metabolically challenged” by an individual not so challenged, at least for the time being, i.e., the coroner.
It’s a good thing I write this shit for the hell of it, and I don’t have a deadline to meet, or a boss to bawl me out for being late. Unusually for me, I’ve had to edit and re-edit this portion of the fucking piece thanks to constantly changing data; one minute George Zimmerman’s not going to be arrested, the next, he is arrested. After that, he’s fled to the Peruvian Andes, only to re-materialize inside a Floridian jail moments later, having turned himself in to the pigs. Oh well, at least they’ve finally made up their goddamn minds once and for all, and the swarthy beaner, turned boot lip blaster, is cooling his heels in the Seminole County hoosegow, for good or ill, for the time being.
Perhaps that’s the entire idea – authorities want greasy Zimmerman to be fucked in his ass, to death. That way – no trial need be conducted, saving taxpayers millions of dollars, and no pesky riots either, saving taxpayers even more millions of dollars. Then the eightballs, their lust for blood sated for the time being, can go back to what they seem to do best – complaining about terrible, racist whiteys, spics, kikes, gooks and whatever else in their peculiar habit of blaming others for their problems. I sit here wondering what may happen next in this ongoing farce – before I post this screed I candidly wager Zimmerman may be fucking dead, via “suicide”, of course.
Anyway, pro or con, talking apes over the Internet are calling Trayvon Martin a thug, which he probably was, considering the evidence, with other talking apes opposing that view, vociferously stating that Martin was the virtual reincarnation of another talking ape called Jesus, i.e., an innocent, virginal moolie who was killed by a vengeful, racist beaner/whitey, for no fucking reason at all. Yet others are claiming that George Zimmerman is the very antithesis of humanity, a virtual Satan in human form, pontificating that he should be executed, while other folks paint him as another incarnation of Jesus, Mohammed or perhaps even Zoroaster, whatever they are, or were.
The truth, an ethereal specter, lies somewhere in between these two diametrically opposing viewpoints. Unfortunately, mostly hairless, talking apes are in total command of this absurd situation, behaving like the uncontrollable, instinctive chimpanzees they are related to, making every value judgment based on their personal emotional viewpoint, which is the absolute WORST way to analyze any given situation.
I have looked at the Martin/Zimmerman debacle in the most objective, detached way that I can, and, making a value judgment based on the evidence available, I cannot see how Zimmerman is guilty of anything other than self-defense, period. For that observation, I have been called a racist/nazi/klansman, my sanity has been questioned; even my sexuality has been questioned. What any of that has to do with the Martin/Zimmerman affair is beyond me; all are ad hominems and straw men put forth by morons in a pathetic attempt to discredit my position. Several items not considered by those who attempt to “argue” in such a fashion – I did not and do not know either Martin or Zimmerman, and I never could have known them, considering I live thousands of miles from where the situation transpired. Therefore, it is logical to assume that I really don’t give a fuck what happened or happens to either party, except in passing – a year from now I won’t even remember about it unless prompted. Further, had the roles been reversed, i.e., Trayvon Martin cast as a spic and George Zimmerman as a nigger, based on the evidence presented, I would come to the same conclusion, self defense with regard to the character of “George Zimmerman”. You see people, I truly don’t give a goddamn fuck what “color” they were, black, brown, pink or green – Zimmerman’s story, corroborated by available evidence presented, seems to be the best explanation for what happened, period.
Hopefully, that detailed explanation of my stance on the case is clear enough for anyone reading this screed, though I do have my doubts.
Get this – some smart-mouthed cocksucker on wagist.com perhaps a week or so back wrote that he had advised a “friend” to “report” what I have written here; an empty threat uttered by a child with no knowledge of the law as it pertains to commentaries, polemics, what have you. I personally don’t care if his “friend” reported Conway’s Blog to motherfucking god; I fear no god and I fear no man; I never did, and I never will. Undaunted by his absurd threat, I told the little bastard to send fucking links to the head nigger, Barack Obama, and his scheming henchman Eric Holder – to see what the narcissistic jackanapes would do, which is nothing at all. You see, the top gangster can’t do anything about what I have written, legally, that is, as nothing I have ever composed here can even be remotely construed as a threat to anyone, and is protected, political speech, according to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. Sure, you and others, along with nigger Obama and his devoted minions, may not like what I have to say, but there is nothing in a legal sense that can be done about it, other than closing the page, cursing my name and moving on to something more in accordance with your tastes.
Could the head nigger have my head blown off? Sure he could, but not legally – since when has that small inconvenience stopped those like him before – just ask JFK, if you are silly enough to believe in “afterlives”, or mediums. Hell, I won’t give a shit anyway, should such an occurrence happen, as I will no longer exist – just like nigger Trayvon Martin, whose carcass sits around somewhere, stinking and gathering mold, rotting away in a box like fucking Michael Jackson.
Returning to the vexing matter at hand, the imprisonment of George Zimmerman, gun-toting spic at large, now in custody thanks to the cunning machinations of a pack of eightballs and their willing facilitator, an ugly, old, upwardly mobile cracker cunt named Angela Corey. You should see the laughable arrest affidavit – some of the most contrived, Goebbelsian horseshit I have ever had the misfortune to peruse. All of it is in total contradiction to ascertained fact – plainly stating that Zoot Zimmerman chased down Moolie Martin and then blasted away for the hell of it, sending an innocent nigger up to Jeebus or something.
The affidavit, of course, ignores the witness supported FACT that Zimmerman was being pounded upon by the arrogant, vicious thug Martin when the shooting occurred. It also ignores the supported FACT that greasy Zimmerman had physical injuries, and it ignores the supported FACT that after five hours of interrogation by duly sworn pigs, sans a lawyer mind you, that Zimmerman was released without charge.
Along with all of that, we have allusions that Trayvon Martin was a clandestine dope peddler, a common thief with an appetite for jewelry, a posturing thug who was into violence, together with the promotion of such – considering his YouTube videos – with the added fact that his scholastic records are “sealed” by his parents. Why? Really, if moolie Martin is such a motherfucking saint – why aren’t all of his records public, and open for scrutiny? It’s not as if “little Trayvon” will give a fuck – considering that he is DEAD and GONE. His parents are stating they want to protect “dear little Trayvon’s” memory, and other nonsense, hoping that Occam’s razor will not be employed by villains like me – that is if they have ever even fucking heard of William of Occam, or Ockham, should the reader prefer that spelling. Fact is, Martin’s parents are hiding something regarding their deceased son/thug, and most people are too fucking stupid to see that. Really folks, if Trayvon Martin did indeed have an exemplary record, and was such a brilliant student, as is promoted by some rhetoricians in the media – why don’t they parade that around like a sideshow spectacle? I certainly would.
All of the above are glaring inconsistencies, especially the “affidavit” – considering the actual evidence presented in the case. That noted, I bluntly charge that dog faced cunt Corey is a cowardly, amoral twat with the ethical outlook of Machiavelli. I further submit the she is only interested in her goddamned career, coerced by opportunistic jigs like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to make an example of a “whitey”, when in reality Zimmerman is no more a cracker than fucking Gandhi was. Further, I do indeed like how amoral Goebbelsian manipulators in the controlled media have deliberately lightened photographs of the accused greaser, in an effort to make his persona appear more “white” to the slack-jawed drones. Hell, to complete the transformation, I suggest they photoshop blue eyes on Zimmerman, and perhaps even give him a Hitler moustache.
In closing this invective strewn polemic, if it were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, using supporting evidence, that beaner Zimmerman was a liar who deliberately went out of his way to kill a hapless nigger, what would I say?
I’d say fry his ass – roast him on a spit like a pig at a luau, or even crucify him in the town square, but the evidence does not at all support the dubious charge that Zimmerman is lying.
Ergo, my call on the affair: Again, justifiable homicide.
Regards,
Conway

Mike Wallace: 1918-2012

April 9, 2012

Just a short note here.

Mike Wallace of “60 Minutes” has died, probably the last journalist who had an even remote sense of OBJECTIVITY when it came to reporting the news.

His loss will be felt by those who admire the concept of critical thinking, but not by anyone else, I wager.

Oh well, life sucks, for the most part – and then you die.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers